Efficacy of Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Therapy in Male Patients: Comparison between Pituitary Stalk Interruption Syndrome and Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

Abstract

ObjectivePulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), widely used to induce spermatogenesis in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) patients, can restore the pituitary-testis axis function in men with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS). This retrospective study aimed to compare the differences in the long-term efficacy of pulsatile GnRH therapy on PSIS and CHH. MethodsPatients with PSIS (n = 25) or CHH (n = 64) who received pulsatile GnRH therapy for ≥3 months were included in this retrospective study. The rate of successful spermatogenesis, the median time to achieve spermatogenesis, serum gonadotropins, total testosterone, and testicular size were compared. ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable except for the lower basal testosterone, triptorelin-stimulated peak luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone in patients with PSIS. With similar duration of treatment and a significantly higher GnRH dose (P < .001), small increments in LH (2.82 [1.4, 4.55] vs 5.89 [3.88, 8.02] IU/L; P < .001), total testosterone (0.38 [0, 1.34] vs 2.34 [1.34, 3.66] ng/mL; P < .001), and testicular volume (5.3 ± 4.5 vs 8.8 ± 4.8 mL, P < .05) were observed. However, spermatogenesis rate (52.0% vs 70.3%, P > .05), median time of sperm appearance (14 vs 11 months, P > .05), sperm concentration, and progressive motility were comparable. Basal testicular volume (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27) and peak LH levels (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.0-1.23) were predictors for early sperm appearance. ConclusionsPulsatile GnRH therapy can improve gonad function and induce spermatogenesis in men with PSIS. However, its efficacy may be inferior to that in CHH.