Abstract

Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has resulted in substantial blood loss and the frequent need for homologous blood transfusion. In this study, the efficacy of autologous blood transfusion, from medical and financial perspectives, was evaluated in patients undergoing RRP. Between 1994 and 2000, 80 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent RRP in our institute. Based on informed consent, preoperative donation of autologous blood (PDA) was performed in 65 out of 80 patienets. Four or six units were donated during the first 3 years; however, donation units were reduced to a maximum of 4 units since 1997 onwards. The discard rate of donated blood and frequency of homologous transfusion were examined. Changes of hematocrit (Ht) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels through donation and surgery and important factors that may affect postoperative levels of Ht and Hb were evaluated in 56 patients receiving 4-unit donations. Overall, 2 or 4 units of donated blood were discarded in four patients and homologous transfusion was required in two patients. In 56 patients receiving 4-unit donation, the mean Ht level at predonation was 43.3%. Following donation, this decreased to 35.7%. The administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) relieved declining Ht levels following donation, but changes in Ht levels after surgery were minor. Important factors related to postoperative decline of Ht and Hb levels were operative time and blood loss. The program of 4-unit PDA can be performed safely without rHuEpo injection, and it is useful to reduce the risk of requiring homologous transfusion. However, more efficient programs to relieve patient burden and to reduce medical cost are needed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.