Efficacy of Oral Versus Injectable Iron in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Two-Year Cross-Sectional Study Conducted at a Rural Teaching Hospital.

Abstract

AimAnaemia (particularly iron deficiency) is of important concern in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) as it reflects the outcome of the disease. Current recommendations for the use of intravenous iron (IV) therapy in the management of anaemia in such patients are limited. This study highlights the comparison of oral to intravenous iron in patients with chronic kidney disease.Materials and methodsThis is a prospective case-control study comparing intravenous iron to oral iron in chronic kidney disease patients admitted to the Medicine Department of Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, in central India from October 2018 to October 2020. A total of 150 patients were divided into two groups of 75 each, one receiving oral iron (ferrous sulfate 325 mg tablets) and the other intravenous iron (IV iron sucrose).ResultsSerum iron, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TS) showed increased levels in the IV iron group than in the oral iron group. In the IV group, a statistically significant increase was found in haemoglobin levels after therapy among all stages of kidney disease (p<0.05) while the same was not reported in the oral iron group.ConclusionIV iron sucrose therapy had been found to be effective, well-tolerated, and more successful than oral iron treatment in chronic kidney disease patients as far as the parameter of iron deficiency anaemia is concerned.