Abstract

To compare the efficacy of minimally invasive pectopexy with I-stop-mini (MPI) and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with Obtryx (MSO). Women with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) stage III or more and overt stress urinary incontinence from May 2018 to May 2021 were included. Patients with meshes fixed on the cervix or vaginal vault and bilateral pectineal ligament with I-stop-mini were classified into the MPI group, while those fixed on the apex and sacral promontory with Obtryx were classified into the MSO group. The primary outcomes were 1-year-postoperative POP-Q stage, patient-reported urinary and prolapse outcomes (Urogenital Distress Inventory-6, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6), 1-h pad test, and sexual life quality (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included operative data and adverse events. The efficacy of MPI was similar to that of MSO according to the primary outcomes. MPI had shorter operative times (133.4 ± 30.6min versus 199.3 ± 20.9min, P=0.001) and lower incidence rate of abdominal pain (0% vs 20%, P=0.02) and groin pain (8% vs 40%, P=0.01) than MSO. MPI showed similar efficacy to MSO, but demonstrated shorter operative times and lower incidence rates of abdominal and groin pain.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.