Efficacy of medial rectus plication versus resection for exotropia: a meta-analysis.

Abstract

To compare the outcomes of medial rectus plication and medial rectus resection procedures in the treatment of exotropia. Articles from Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until July 2021 with a minimum follow-up period of 1month were retrieved. No restriction on language was applied. Eligible studies must comply with the inclusion criteria. Only studies with comparisons between unilateral medial rectus plication versus unilateral medial rectus resection, unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus plication (RP) versus unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection (RR), or bilateral medial rectus plication(BMRP) versus bilateral medial rectus resection (BMRR) would be included for subsequent analysis. Two primary outcomes were specified: success rate and mean postoperative deviation. Dichotomous data were calculated as pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous data as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% CIs. A total of 8 studies with 557 participants were enrolled in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria. Seven studies compared lateral rectus recession + medial rectus plication to unilateral lateral rectus recession + medial rectus resection and one study compared bilateral medial rectus plication to bilateral medial rectus resection. Differences in success rates between plication and resection groups were not statistically significant (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-1.02; P = 0.06), and the unsatisfactory effects (the undercorrection and overcorrection rates) between the two groups were comparable. Additionally, there were also no significant differences in postoperative deviation and the amount of exodrift between the two groups. This meta-analysis provides evidence that both the medial rectus plication and medial rectus resection procedures have similar efficacy in the treatment of exotropia.