Abstract

Bifurcation of the carotid artery at a cephalic location greatly increases the risk associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Mandibular subluxation (MS) can improve access to the cephalic location; however, the benefits of MS remain unclear. The present study objectively assessed the efficacy of MS. MS was performed with only wire fixation of healthy teeth in four patients (Group A), with wire fixation reinforced by inserting Coltoflax® putty between healthy teeth in 17 patients (Group B), and with wiring between maxillary and mandibular screws reinforced by inserting Coltoflax® putty between the wires in five edentulous patients (Group C). Pre- and postoperative axial computed tomography angiography images at the level of the tip of the mastoid process were used to compare the following measurements: mastoid-mandible distance between the anterior margin of the mastoid process and posterior margin of the mandible; and mastoid-internal carotid artery-mandible (MIM) angle between the line connecting the anterior margin of the mastoid process and the center of the internal carotid artery, and the line connecting the posterior margin of the mandible and the center of the internal carotid artery. MS increased the overall mastoid–mandible distance by 5.7 ± 3.1 mm. The increase was significantly greater in Group B (6.7 ± 2.0 mm) than in Group A or C (4.0 ± 4.1 mm) (P=0.032). MS increased the overall MIM angle by 13.3 ± 7.9o. MS with the combination of wire with Coltoflax® putty offered the widest surgical corridor for CEA.

Highlights

  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) requires adequate exposure of the cephalic location of the internal carotid artery (ICA) for removal of the distal end of the plaque

  • The present study used computed tomography (CT) angiography to objectively assess the efficacy of Mandibular subluxation (MS) with three methods for CEA

  • The following characteristics on the pre- and postoperative axial CT angiography images at the level of the tip of the mastoid process were compared on the affected side: mastoid-mandible distance between the anterior margin of the mastoid process and posterior margin of the mandible (Figure 2A); and mastoid-ICA-mandible (MIM) angle created by the line connecting the anterior margin of the mastoid process and the center of the ICA, and the line connecting the posterior margin of the mandible and the center of the ICA (Figure 2B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) requires adequate exposure of the cephalic location of the internal carotid artery (ICA) for removal of the distal end of the plaque. CEA becomes a high-risk procedure if the bifurcation of the carotid artery is located at a cephalic location [1]. In Japanese patients, the position of the carotid artery bifurcation is approximately one vertebral body higher than in patients in Western countries [2], so that adequate exposure of the ICA is more difficult to achieve. Mandibular subluxation (MS) for CEA has been proposed to access such a cephalic location of the bifurcation [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The present study used computed tomography (CT) angiography to objectively assess the efficacy of MS with three methods for CEA

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.