Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesThe incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in acute leukemia patients following induction or consolidation chemotherapy is high. Several clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of a fluoroquinolone prophylaxis to prevent bacterial infection in patients being prone to prolonged profound neutropenia.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of levofloxacin as a prophylaxis for FN patients following chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Two databases from MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for published studies indexed before 10 July 2018.ResultsA total of 862 acute leukemia patients were included, with 356 in the levofloxacin prophylaxis arm and 506 in the no-prophylaxis arm. Patients receiving levofloxacin had a significantly lower FN rate than patients who did not receive the antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.58, p < .00001, I2 = 0%). The rate of microbiologically documented infection in the no-prophylaxis group was higher than that for the levofloxacin prophylaxis group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34–0.60, p < .00001, I2 = 0%). The bacteremia rate in the levofloxacin prophylaxis group was significantly lower than that for the no-prophylaxis group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.66, p < .00001, I2 = 0%). However, the mortality rates of the two groups were quite similar between the two groups (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.34–1.33, p = .26, I2 = 0%).ConclusionsAlthough the levofloxacin prophylaxis for the acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy showed advantages for infectious complications, it did not affect mortality.

Highlights

  • Febrile neutropenia (FN) in acute leukemia patients after receiving an induction or consolidation chemotherapy course is a matter of major concern

  • The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to focus on the available studies and summarize their results in order to compare the efficacy and complications of the use of a levofloxacin prophylaxis and noantibiotic prophylaxis during induction or consolidation chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients

  • The clinical features, types of acute leukemia, dose and duration of levofloxacin prophylaxis, duration of neutropenia, country, study period, article type, and the quality assessment score for each study are tabulated at Table 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Febrile neutropenia (FN) in acute leukemia patients after receiving an induction or consolidation chemotherapy course is a matter of major concern. There have been some drawbacks in patients who received a fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, such as an increasing quinolone resistance rate in gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections; emerging quinolone-resistant, viridans-group streptococcal infections in the oropharynx; and an increasing rate of Clostridioides difficile enterocolitis [10,11,12,13]. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to focus on the available studies and summarize their results in order to compare the efficacy and complications of the use of a levofloxacin prophylaxis and noantibiotic prophylaxis during induction or consolidation chemotherapy in AML and ALL patients

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call