Abstract

Simple SummaryNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms, but their incidence is rising. Despite the recent understanding of and advances in the treatment of NENs, the clinical outcomes of patients with NENs, especially high-grade NENs, are poor. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced or metastatic NENs. In 10 studies with 464 patients, the pooled overall response rate was 15.5% (95% confidence interval, 9.5–24.3%), but the response differed according to the primary tumor site, tumor differentiation, and drug regimen. Poorly differentiated NENs consistently showed a better overall response rate than well-differentiated NENs in multiple sensitivity analyses, suggesting that different expression of immune checkpoints and tumor mutational burden may influence the treatment efficacy of ICIs for advanced or metastatic NENs. The variation in treatment efficacy of ICIs according to tumor differentiation and drug regimen should be considered for patient-tailored management.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced/metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify studies that provide data on treatment response and/or survival outcomes of advanced/metastatic NEN patients treated with ICIs. The overall response rate (ORR) was pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-regression was performed to explore factors influencing the ORR. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of survival was performed using stratified Cox regression. Ten studies (464 patients) were included. The overall pooled ORR was 15.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 9.5–24.3%), and it varied according to the primary site (thoracic, 24.7%; gastro–entero–pancreatic, 9.5%), tumor differentiation (poorly differentiated, 22.7%; well-differentiated, 10.4%), and drug regimen (combination, 25.3%; monotherapy, 10.1%). All these variables significantly influenced the ORR. Tumor differentiation was associated with both overall survival and progression-free survival (hazard ratio of poorly differentiated tumors, 4.2 (95% CI, 2.0–8.7) and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6–4.4), respectively). Thus, the treatment efficacy of ICIs for advanced/metastatic NENs varied according to primary site, tumor differentiation, and drug regimen. Poorly differentiated NENs showed a better ORR than well-differentiated NENs but had a negative impact on survival.

Highlights

  • Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the neuroendocrine cells of various organs [1]

  • All studies included patients with advanced or metastatic NENs, and six studies specified that the patients had progressed during previous systemic treatment(s)

  • The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) regimens varied between studies; six studies involved ICI monotherapy only, two studies reported on an ICI combination therapy only, and two studies described both ICI monotherapy and combination therapy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the neuroendocrine cells of various organs [1]. The behavior and prognosis of NENs are highly variable and depend on the site of origin, tumor grade, and differentiation [2]. NENs are relatively uncommon tumors, recent reports have shown that their incidence and prevalence are growing worldwide [3,4,5]. For patients with advanced/metastatic NENs, systemic therapy is the only available treatment option. Despite recent progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology and molecular biology, as well as advances in treatment strategies for NENs [9,10,11], the clinical outcomes for individuals with high-grade NENs are poor, with a reported median overall survival (OS) of 11 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4 months for patients with poorly differentiated (PD) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) [12,13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call