Abstract

High-intensity interval training has been shown to improve health/fitness factors in adults. Evidence is limited in older adults with chronic disease and increased risk for exercise-related complications and for resistance training modes. PURPOSE: Assess the efficacy (aerobic and functional fitness) and safety of high-intensity resistance and sprint-cycle interval training in at-risk older adults. METHODS: Forty-eight participants (30 women; 69±6 years; 28.0±5.5 kg/m2; 60% with ≥2 chronic diseases) trained 3 days/week for 6 weeks. Participants were randomized to conditions: 1) high-intensity sprint interval cycle training (SIT; N=17); 2) high-intensity resistance training (HIRT; N=20); or 3) moderate-intensity continuous aerobic exercise (MICE; active control; N=11). Baseline and post-training measures included: maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max), body composition, functional movement screen (FMS), floor-transfer-time (FTT), timed-up-and-go (TUG), balance, and flexibility. Subjective measures were: satisfaction with physical function, mobility, and physical activity enjoyment (PACES). Data analysis: repeated measure ANOVA and paired-t tests (P<0.05). RESULTS: VO2max improved similarly in all groups (SIT 2.2±0.3; HIRT=3.5±0.7. MICE 2.1±0.5 ml/kg/min, P<0.01 for all). Both high-intensity groups improved in FTT (HIRT=17%, P=<0.01; SIT =12%, P<0.05) and FMS (HIRT=17%, SIT =10%, P<0.01). Only HIRT improved in TUG (10.6%) and balance (9%). Perceived satisfaction with physical function improved in all groups (HIRT=389%; SIT=266%; MICE = 167%; all P<0.01) with similarly high overall enjoyment (5.8-6.3 out of 7; P<0.05). No injuries or adverse events occurred with training. CONCLUSION: HIRT and SIT required less time (~28 minutes) than MICE guidelines, elicited equivalent gains in aerobic fitness, and appear to be safe for older adults with chronic disease. Additional functional fitness benefits (mobility and FMS) accompanied high-intensity training (SIT/HIRT). HIRT elicited improvements in mobility, balance, and 4 of 7 FMS measures compared to SIT (2 of 7 FMS measures). These HIRT specific gains are associated with enhanced independence and ability to perform activities of daily living. Future studies should confirm these findings and assess longer training durations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call