Efficacy of gliclazide in comparison with other sulphonylureas in the treatment of NIDDM

Abstract

Three studies were performed to assess the efficacy of various sulphonylureas in the management of diet-failed NIDDM patients. In the first study, 224 patients inadequately controlled by diet alone or with oral hypoglycaemics received gliclazide in addition to diet or in place of existing drugs for three months. The dosage was adjusted to obtain adequate control or up to the maximum recommended dosage. Good glycaemic control was achieved in 65% of patients. Conversion from other oral hypoglycaemics to gliclazide led to an improvement in control except in cases previously treated with glibenclamide. In the second study, diabetic control was compared in 112 NIDDM patients treated concurrently for one year with chlorpropamide, glipizide, gliquidone, glibenclamide or gliclazide. On the basis of HbA 1 levels, the best results were obtained with glibenclamide and gliclazide, leading to normal HbA 1 levels in 74% and 80% of patients, respectively. In the third study, secondary failure rates were assessed in 248 NIDDM patients treated for five years with gliclazide, glibenclamide or glipizide. Gliclazide had the lowest secondary failure rate (7%) and was significantly better than glipizide (25.6% failures in five years), but the difference relative to glibenclamide (17.9%) just failed to reach the threshold of significance. The results of these studies show that gliclazide is a potent hypoglycaemic agent which compares favourably with others of its type. It has a low incidence of side effects, few problems with hypoglycaemia, and retains its efficacy longer than other sulphonylureas. Gliclazide may therefore be considered a first choice for the therapy of diet-failed NIDDM patients.