Abstract
BackgroundThis study compared the clinical results of fracture stems and conventional stems using the same glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. MethodsThis retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures from 2014 to 2020. The average age at surgery was 79.2 (range, 65–92) years, with 33 female shoulders. Fracture types per Neer classification were 3-part fracture, 4-part fracture, in 13 and 22 shoulders, respectively. The final follow-up period was 35 (range, 24–81) months. The Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, shoulder range of motion, and healing of greater tuberosities at the final follow-up of AEQUALIS™ REVERSED (Conventional stem group: n = 15) and AEQUALIS™ REVERSED FX (Fractured stem group: n = 20) were retrospectively investigated. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in age at surgery, sex, body mass index, fracture type, waiting time from injury to surgery, or preoperative general condition between the groups. The Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores of the fractured stem group were significantly higher than those of the conventional stem group (P = 0.038 and P = 0.023, respectively). The anterior elevation and external rotation at the side of the fractured stem group also showed significantly higher values than those of the conventional stem group (fractured stem group vs. conventional stem group: anterior elevation 127° ± 25° vs. 105° ± 35°, P = 0.041; external rotation 28° ± 13° vs. 13° ± 12°, P = 0.015). The greater tuberosity healing rate was 46.7% (7/15) in the conventional stem group and 85.0% (17/20) in the fractured stem group (P＝0.027). ConclusionsThe findings suggest that use of a fracture-specific stem rather than a conventional stem in Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures improves tuberosity healing, postoperative range of motion, and clinical scores.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
