Abstract

Research has demonstrated that swine viruses can be transmitted via feed. There­fore, strategies are needed to prevent or mitigate swine viruses in feed. The use of chemical feed additives is a strategy that has been shown to have potential utility for this purpose. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available formaldehyde-based feed additive, medium chain fatty acid blend (MCFA), and commercially available fatty acid-based products for mitigation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) as viral mitigants in a feed matrix. Experimental treatments consisted of: 1) non-treated, individually inoculated virus controls (positive control); 2) 0.33% commercial formaldehyde-based product (Sal Curb; Kemin Industries, Inc.; Des Moines, IA); 3) 0.50% MCFA blend (1:1:1 ratio of C6:0, C8:0, and C10:0, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); 4) 0.25%; 5) 0.50%; or 6) 1.00% of commercial dry mono and diglyceride-based product (Furst Strike; Furst-McNess Company, Freeport, IL); 7) 0.25%; 8) 0.50%; or 9) 1.00% of commercial dry mono and diglyceride-based product (Furst Protect; Furst-McNess Company, Freeport, IL); 10) 0.25%; 11) 0.50%; or 12) 1.00% dry mono and diglyceride-based experimental product (Furst-McNess Company, Freeport, IL). In total there were 12 treatments with 3 replications per treat­ment. A complete swine feed was treated with each chemical treatment before inocula­tion with 106 TCID50/g of feed with PEDV or PRRSV. Post-inoculation feed was held at ambient temperature for 24 h before being analyzed via quantitative real time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The analyzed values represent the cycle threshold (Ct). A lower Ct value indicates a higher level of detectable viral nucleic acid. Formaldehyde and MCFA decreased (P < 0.05) the detectable RNA concentration of PEDV and PRRSV compared to all other treatments. Furst Strike, Furst Protect, and the experi­mental product did not significantly reduce detectable concentrations of RNA for PEDV or PRRSV. In conclusion, MCFA and formaldehyde chemical treatments are effective at reducing nucleic acid levels of PEDV and PRRSV in feed.

Highlights

  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) was first seen in the United States in the late 1980s

  • A complete swine feed was treated with each chemical treatment before inoculation with 106 TCID50/g of feed with Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) or PRRSV

  • Formaldehyde and medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) decreased (P < 0.05) the detectable RNA concentration of PEDV and PRRSV compared to all other treatments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) was first seen in the United States in the late 1980s. Previous research has evaluated the effects of medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), essential oils, organic acids, and formaldehyde.[12] Research has shown the efficacy of 0.5–1.0% inclusion of a 1:1:1 ratio blend of MCFA (hexanoic, C6:0; octanoic, C8:0; and decanoic, and C10:0 acids) and the inclusion of 0.325% formaldehyde significantly reduced PEDV RNA levels in swine feed.[7,13] All of the previous research has been focused on PEDV and no research has examined the effect of formaldehyde or MCFA against PRRSV Along with testing these proven products, questions arise about other products and fatty acids and their efficacy as viral mitigants in feed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of commercial formaldehyde, MCFA, and commercially available fatty acid-based products against PEDV and PRRSV as viral mitigants in a feed matrix

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call