Abstract

ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of efficacy and security of fast track surgery (FTS) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Databases and supplemented by other searches to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison of fast track surgery combined with laparoscopy versus laparoscopy separately used in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer before December 2016. After screening for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment, meta-analysis was conducted by the Review Manager 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 6 RCTs, involving 464 patients, were included. There were 232 patients in the FTS group and conventional care group separately. Compared with the conventional care group, patients of FTS group had shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD = −1.85, 95%CI: (−2.60, −1.11), P < .00001], earlier first flatus [WMD = −9.33, 95%CI: (−13.74, −4.91), P < .0001], lower level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at postoperative day 4 [WMD = −13.94, 95%CI: (−22.74, −5.15), P = .002], and less hospitalization fees [SMD = −1.12, 95%CI: (−2.07, −0.18), P = .02]. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications between the two groups. ConclusionBased on current evidence, the FTS protocol is safe and effective in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Due to the limitations of our study, further larger and multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call