Abstract
There are no clinical studies about treatment of distal tibia fractures using far cortical locking (FCL) screws, even though it has been shown to be superior to standard locking screws in biomechanical studies. We compared the efficacy of FCL screws to that of traditional locking screws. Twenty-five distal tibia fractures were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using traditional locking screws, whereas 20 were treated using FCL screws. We retrospectively compared time taken for callus formation and radiographic bone union between 2 groups. The effect of age, sex, diabetes, and smoking history on bone healing was analyzed. Complications were also noted. As a result, there was no significant difference in age (p = .292), sex (p=1.0), diabetes (p=1.0), or smoking history (p = .704) between 2 groups. Time to callus formation was 77.5 days in the FCL group, and 96 days in the traditional group (p = .023). Average time to bone union was 134.8 days, and 163.1 days in the FCL group and the traditional group, respectively (p = .017). There was one case of screw loosening in the FCL group, and one case of screw breakage in the traditional group. This study suggests that FCL screws promote quicker healing of distal tibia fractures than traditional locking screws.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
