Efficacy of Epley’s canalith repositioning procedure according to the number of repetitions in the same session: comparison of three protocols

Abstract

Background The canalith repositioning manoeuvre (CRM) described by Epley remains a grade A recommended treatment for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) of the posterior semicircular canal (PSC). However, significant variability in the efficacy of Epley CRM has been reported. Aims To compare the treatment efficacy of different combinations of the Epley CRM and Dix-Hallpike retest. Material and methods Patients with PSC BPPV were divided into one of the following three treatment groups. Manoeuvre group (M): patients underwent a single Epley CRM without subsequent Dix-Hallpike retesting. Manoeuvre-Control group (MC): patients underwent up to three Epley CRM followed by Dix-Hallpike retesting until nystagmus resolution. Manoeuvre-Control-Manoeuvre group (MCM): A similar procedure to that used in the MC group except that, after the negative Dix-Hallpike retest, there was an additional CRM. Results A more favourable tendency for recovery was observed in the MCM group. There was a positive odds ratio of 1.1 between groups M and MC at the first control, 2.7 between groups M and MCM, and 2.5 between groups MC and MCM. Conclusions and significance Close repetition of a single Epley CRM after the first effective one would allow a positional retest to be combined with a reduction in the risk of persistent/recurrent BPPV.