Efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery alone versus in combination with neurosurgical intervention for the treatment of pediatric subdural empyema

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare treatment outcomes for sinogenic subdural empyema (SE) between those managed with initial endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) alone versus those treated with a combination of ESS and craniotomy over the last decade at our institution. To better characterize subdural empyema with regard to presentation, causative pathogens, and treatment course. MethodsRetrospective single-center chart review to identify and evaluate pediatric SE patients between 2009 and 2019. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were classified in one of two groups: those who initially underwent ESS or frontal trephination without concurrent neurosurgical procedure and those who underwent craniotomy or burr hole in addition to a sinus procedure. Presenting characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsEighteen patients met inclusion criteria. The ESS alone and the ESS + craniotomy subgroups each had 9 patients with similar baseline characteristics. The ESS + craniotomy group was more likely to present with neurological symptoms (p = 0.039) and have multiple intracranial fluid collections (p = 0.046). 74.1% of patients presented to the Emergency Department (ED) or to their primary medical doctor and were treated with outpatient management prior to hospitalization with definitive surgical management. The most common presenting symptoms were fever, headache and nausea/vomiting. There were no differences between treatment groups in rate of return to the operating room (OR) (p = 1.00), length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.553), or adverse neurological outcomes (p = 0.456). 44.4% of patients in the ESS alone group eventually required neurosurgical intervention. ConclusionsSurgical SE patients often present to medical professionals in the primary care setting or ED and are managed with outpatient treatment before admission with definitive treatment. In this small retrospective cohort patients who underwent sinus intervention alone had similar rates of return to OR, LOS and adverse neurological outcomes use as those who underwent a sinus procedure in coordination with a neurosurgical intervention. There may be a group of patients with SE who may be managed with endoscopic procedures alone and further studies should seek to determine the characteristics of this population.