Abstract
ObjectiveSafe surgery for pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is important to decrease postoperative events and improve cost-effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to compare surgical efficacy and safety between powered intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (PITA) and extracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy for OSA in children. MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 93 children with OSA who underwent PITA and 81 children who underwent conventional extracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy at a tertiary hospital. Data analysis using multivariate, multiple regression, and binomial logistic regression analyses was performed. ResultsPITA reduced the odds of postoperative hemorrhage by 8.95% (odds ratio [OR]: 5.69, p = 0.013) and of secondary hemorrhage by 8.8% (OR: 10.08, p = 0.006), decreased postoperative analgesia use by 0.35% (p < 0.001), and increased oral intake on postoperative day 1 by 17% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in early hemorrhage or regrowth rates between the groups. ConclusionPITA could reduce the risk of secondary hemorrhage and improve postoperative quality of life, which are ideal clinical benefits of surgery in pediatric patients with OSA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
