Abstract

Background: Diabetic patients show higher adverse ischemic event rates and mortality when undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarctions. Therefore, diabetic patients might benefit even more from modern-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). The aim of the present study was to compare adverse ischemic events and mortality rates between bare-metal stents (BMS) and DES in diabetic patients admitted with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (STEMI) with non-diabetic patients as the control group. Methods: All STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI and stent implantation documented between 2006 and 2019 in the Bremen STEMI registry entered the analysis. Efficacy was defined as a combination of in-stent thrombosis, myocardial re-infarction or additional target lesion revascularization at one year. Results: Of 8356 patients which entered analysis, 1554 (19%) were diabetics, while 6802 (81%) were not. 879 (57%) of the diabetics received a DES. In a multivariate model, DES implantation in diabetics compared to BMS was associated with lower rates of in-stent thrombosis (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05–0.6), myocardial re-infarctions (OR 0.35, 95%CI, 0.2–0.7, p < 0.01) and of the combined endpoint at 1 year ((ST + MI + TLR): OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.2–0.6, p < 0.01), with a trend towards lower 5-year mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.3–1.0, p = 0.058). When comparing diabetic to non-diabetic patients, an elevation in event rates for diabetics was only detectable in BMS (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.5–0.7, p < 0.01); however, this did not persist when treated with a DES (OR 1.03 95% CI 0.7–1.6, p = 0.9). Conclusions: In STEMI patients with diabetes, the use of DES significantly reduced ischemic event rates and, unlike with BMS, adverse ischemic event rates became similar to non-diabetic patients.

Highlights

  • Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) [1,2]

  • Patients with recent acute ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) were excluded from the FREEDOM trial and recent data from the Netherlands has shown that only a minority of patients with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergo emergency coronaryartery bypass grafting (CABG), which limits the therapeutic options for STEMI patients with diabetes even in the presence of advanced CAD [8]

  • 992 patients were excluded because they were not treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 542 patients were excluded, because no stent was implanted during PCI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) [1,2]. Previous studies have consistently shown that diabetes mellitus is associated with a poorer outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with higher rates of re-stenosis occurring, as well as higher incidences of death and myocardial infarctions [4,5]. The FREEDOM trial has shown that coronaryartery bypass grafting (CABG) was superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), resulting in reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction, with an increased risk of stroke [7]. Diabetic patients show higher adverse ischemic event rates and mortality when undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarctions. The aim of the present study was to compare adverse ischemic events and mortality rates between bare-metal stents (BMS) and DES in diabetic patients admitted with ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (STEMI) with non-diabetic patients as the control group. Results: Of 8356 patients which entered analysis, 1554 (19%) were diabetics, while 6802 (81%) were not

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.