Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of trabecular microbypass stent (iStent) implantation in combined mechanism glaucoma (CMG). Retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the medical charts of patients with the following scenarios: (1) primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification (PE), (2) POAG undergoing PE with iStent (POAG-PE/iStent), (3) CMG undergoing PE (CMG-PE), and (4) CMG undergoing PE with iStent (CMG-PE/iStent). CMG was defined as narrow-angle glaucoma patients whose angle had opened after iridotomy. Linear mixed-effects models were performed to determine the effect of iStent on postoperative 1-year success rate (intraocular pressure [IOP] ≤ 18 without medication), IOP, and number of medications. Data from 301 eyes were available. The number of eyes (subjects) was 61 (45) in the POAG-PE, 60 (50) in POAG-PE/iStent, 93 (76) in CMG-PE, and 87 (70) in CMG-PE/iStent group. Success criteria were achieved in 13.1% for POAG-PE, 33.3% for POAG-PE/iStent (POAG-PE vs POAG-PE/iStent B 3.01; P < .001), 37.6% for CMG-PE, and 43.7% for CMG-PE/iStent (CMG-PE vs CMG-PE/iStent B 2.25; P < .001). There was no difference in the IOP between POAG-PE and POAG-PE/iStent, and between CMG-PE and CMG-PE/iStent. The iStent significantly reduced number of medications in the POAG (B-0.70; P<.001) and CMG group (B-0.52; P < .001). Comparing the effect of iStent on POAG and CMG, the analysis showed similar iStent efficacy in terms of the success rate, IOP, and number of medications (P > .05). Combined PE/iStent significantly increased success rate and reduced number of medications in CMG patients compared to PE alone. The effects of iStent were comparable between POAG and CMG groups.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call