Abstract
e17001 Background: There is paucity of evidence regarding efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in bladder cancer patients. Radical cystectomy has been standard of care for patients with T2-T4, N0, M0 bladder cancer. However, recent trials have shown better survival rates in patients who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Our meta-analysis is based on the data from non-randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of carboplatin based regimens. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of Medline (Pubmed) and Cochrane (from inception through May, 2018). Only published single arm clinical trials, abstracts of single arm clinical trials and data from one randomized trial on efficacy of neoadjuvant Carboplatin based therapies in patients with bladder cancer were included in our meta-analysis. Total of > 70 studies were identified. Studies which were duplicate, included adjuvant therapy, systematic reviews or meta-analysis, trials not based on neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. A random effect model was used to calculate pooled proportions. Studies based on ITT protocol were analyzed separately as well as studies based on per protocol analysis. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0 was used. Results: The pooled proportion of pCR (pathologic complete response) calculated from trials based on ITT analysis was 0.23 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28, P= 0.000). Tests for statistical heterogeneity was non-significant heterogeneity p-value = 0.79 (I2 = 0 %). The pooled proportion of pCR calculated from trials based on per-protocol analysis was 0.29 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.42, P= 0.002). Tests for statistical heterogeneity show nonsignificant heterogeneity p-value = 0.95 (I2 = 0 %). The pooled proportion of ORR (objective response rate) calculated from trials based on per-protocol analysis was 0.69 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.78, P= 0.001). Tests for statistical heterogeneity showed heterogeneity p-value = 0.203 (I2 = 37.3). The pooled proportion of cCR (clinical Complete response) calculated from trials based on per-protocol analysis was 0.25 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.34, P= 0.000). Tests for statistical heterogeneity did not show heterogeneity p-value = 0.80 (I2 = 0%). The pooled proportion of cPR (clinical Partial Response) calculated from trials based on per-protocol analysis was 0.47 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.56, P= 0.59). Tests for statistical heterogeneity did not show heterogeneity p-value = 0.93 (I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Carboplatin based chemotherapy has shown significant efficacy in terms of over-all response rate, pathologic complete response and clinical complete response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.