Efficacy of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training in females with pelvic floor dysfunction

Abstract

BackgroundStress urinary incontinence (SUI), fecal incontinence (FI) and/or pelvic floor dyssynergia, with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are described as pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the first-line therapy in the treatment of PFD either alone or combined with biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training (BF-assisted PFMT). Clinical practice regarding BF-assisted PFMT is controversial. AimsTo evaluate the efficacy of BF-assisted PFMT in females with mild to moderate PFD after a maximum duration of up to twelve weeks. Materials and subjects52 females with PFD were classified into 2 groups: Group 1(26 females with (SUI)) and Group 2 (26 females with (FI)) with or without stages I and II (POP). Females older than 20 years old and pelvic floor muscles grade 3–4 were included. Each group was divided in two equal groups (13 patients each): intervention group: performed BF-assisted PFMT and home exercise program (HEP) and control group: performed (HEP). All females were evaluated before and after the end of PFMT program by assessment questionnaires, PFM strength measurements using PFMs grading according to modified oxford score (MOS) and PFM contraction manometric measurements. ResultsParticipation rate was 90%. A Significant improvement was detected in 19 females (79.2%) in the intervention group compared to 7 females (31.8%) in the control group. Initial clinical and electrophysiological assessments were predictive for female improvement. ConclusionBiofeedback-assisted PFMT is an effective therapy compared to PFMT alone for well-motivated females with mild to moderate PFD.