Abstract

BackgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease. It affects people worldwide and traditional Chinese medicine is becoming popular among AR patients because it has a definite clinical effect and there are few adverse reactions. Lung qi deficiency and cold syndrome (LQDCS) is a frequent type of AR, and the Chinese herbal medicine bimin decoction (BMD) is prescribed for it. This study compared the clinical efficacy of BMD for AR patients with LQDCS to the conventional medicine loratadine and fluticasone nasal spray.MethodsThe study was an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. A total of 108 AR patients with LQDCS aged 19 to 60 were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the BMD group or the control group by the central computer system in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to April 2018. In total, 98 participants completed the study (BMD group n = 51 and control group n = 47). Patients in the BMD group received BMD while those in the control group received fluticasone nasal spray and loratadine tablets for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between the baseline and the end of treatment. Changes in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal resistance, and acoustic rhinometry parameters were secondary outcomes. All side effects due to the treatments were recorded.ResultsAfter the 4-week treatment, the total TNSS was significantly reduced in both groups compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). No significant between-groups differences were observed for changes in TNSS scores [− 0.298 (95% confidence interval −0.640 to 0.140)], which was within the defined non-inferiority margin. RQLQ in both groups decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from baseline, though a more obvious reduction was observed for the BMD group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in nasal resistance, nasal volume, or nasal minimum cross-sectional area between groups after treatment (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThese findings indicate that BMD helps relieve the symptoms of perennial AR and improves rhinitis-related quality of life. Our study indicates that BMD is non-inferior to loratadine tablets and fluticasone nasal spray for AR patients with LQDCS.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16010063. Registered on 2 December 2016.

Highlights

  • Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease

  • All participants were recruited from the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (BJHTCM), which is affiliated to Capital Medical University

  • Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) The pretreatment TNSS scores were similar in both groups (BMD group 7.84 ± 1.46, control group 8.43 ± 1.56; P = 0.062)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease. It affects people worldwide and traditional Chinese medicine is becoming popular among AR patients because it has a definite clinical effect and there are few adverse reactions. This study compared the clinical efficacy of BMD for AR patients with LQDCS to the conventional medicine loratadine and fluticasone nasal spray. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease, which can be perennial or intermittent [1]. Therapy for AR mainly includes avoiding allergens, pharmacotherapy, immunotherapy, and patient education; each of these has limitations [2]. Immunotherapy is not popular among patients due to its long therapy cycle (recommended for 3–5 years) and unsatisfactory results [3]. Patients are turning to complementary and alternative medicines, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has increased in popularity [5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call