Abstract

BackgroundRecent field studies indicated that insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) maintain their efficacy despite a high frequency of the knock-down resistance (kdr) gene in Anopheles gambiae populations. It was essential to evaluate ITNs efficacy in areas with metabolic-based resistance.MethodsBifenthrin was used in this experiment because it is considered a promising candidate for bednets impregnation. Nets were treated at 50 mg/m2, a dose that has high insecticidal activity on kdr mosquitoes and at 5 mg/m2, a dose that kills 95% of susceptible mosquitoes under laboratory conditions with 3 minutes exposure. Bednets were holed to mimic physical damage. The trial was conducted in three experimental huts from Pitoa, North-Cameroon where Anopheles gambiae displays metabolic resistance and cohabits with An. funestus.ResultsBifenthrin at 50 mg/m2 significantly reduced anophelines' entry rate (>80%). This was not observed at 5 mg/m2. Both treatments increased exophily in An. gambiae, and to a lesser extent in An. funestus. With bifenthrin at high dosage, over 60% reduction in blood feeding and 75–90% mortality rates were observed in both vectors. Despite presence of holes, only a single An. gambiae and two An. funestus females were collected inside the treated net, and all were found dead. The same trends were observed with low dosage bifenthrin though in most cases, no significant difference was found with the untreated control net.ConclusionBifenthrin-impregnated bednets at 50 mg/m2 were efficient in the reduction of human-vector contact in Pitoa. Considerable personal protection was gained against An. funestus and metabolic pyrethroid resistant An. gambiae populations.

Highlights

  • Recent field studies indicated that insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) maintain their efficacy despite a high frequency of the knock-down resistance gene in Anopheles gambiae populations

  • Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) provide personal protection; a high level of coverage in a population may benefit every individual in the community by contributing to an area-wide reduction in malaria vector populations [19]

  • The personal protection effect of a treatment relative to the control was estimated by the formula: 100 × (Bu-Bt)/Bu, where Bu is the total number of blood-fed mosquitoes in the untreated hut, and Bt is the total number of blood-fed mosquitoes in the treated hut

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent field studies indicated that insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) maintain their efficacy despite a high frequency of the knock-down resistance (kdr) gene in Anopheles gambiae populations. Studies in experimental huts and village scale trials suggest that ITNs maintain their efficacy in areas with high frequency of kdr and insensitive acetylcholinesterase (Ace.IR) resistance genes in An. gambiae [15,16,17,18,19]. Enzymes involved in insecticide detoxification may further jeopardize malaria vector control with insecticide-treated materials This was recently exemplified in South Africa, where metabolic resistance to pyrethroids in An. funestus required a switch back from pyrethroids to DTT for house spraying to restore malaria control [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call