Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and lasers have been widely applied in non-surgical treatments in recent decades; however, their efficacy is not known. The objective of this study was to compare adjunctive PDT, different lasers, and scaling and root planning (SRP) in the management of chronic periodontitis. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing adjunctive PDT, different lasers, and SRP were identified. Relevant data were extracted, and the quality and risk of bias were evaluated. Network meta-analyses were performed to analyze clinical attachment level (CAL) outcomes. Forty-four studies, including 10 types of adjuncts, were included. PDT + SRP and PDT + diode laser (DL)+SRP were significantly more efficient than SRP at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Adjunctive potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser showed significantly more CAL gains than SRP at 6 months. The most effective adjunctive treatment at 3 months was PDT + DL (60 %) and at 6 months was KTP laser (71 %). PDT + DL + SRP and PDT + SRP were found to be preferentially recommended methods. KTP + SRP was significantly superior to SRP at the 6-month follow-up. However, further investigations are necessary.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.