Abstract

Quantification of the setup errors is vital to define appropriate setup margins preventing geographical misses. The no‐action–level (NAL) correction protocol reduces the systematic setup errors and, hence, the setup margins. The manual entry of the setup corrections in the record‐and‐verify software, however, increases the susceptibility of the NAL protocol to human errors. Moreover, the impact of the skin mobility on the anteroposterior patient setup reproducibility in whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) is unknown. In this study, we therefore investigated the potential of fixed vertical couch position‐based patient setup in WBRT. The possibility to introduce a threshold for correction of the systematic setup errors was also explored. We measured the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior–inferior setup errors during fractions 1–12 and weekly thereafter with tangential angled single modality paired imaging. These setup data were used to simulate the residual setup errors of the NAL protocol, the fixed vertical couch position protocol, and the fixed‐action–level protocol with different correction thresholds. Population statistics of the setup errors of 20 breast cancer patients and 20 breast cancer patients with additional regional lymph node (LN) irradiation were calculated to determine the setup margins of each off‐line correction protocol. Our data showed the potential of the fixed vertical couch position protocol to restrict the systematic and random anteroposterior residual setup errors to 1.8 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively. Compared to the NAL protocol, a correction threshold of 2.5 mm reduced the frequency of mediolateral and superior–inferior setup corrections with 40% and 63%, respectively. The implementation of the correction threshold did not deteriorate the accuracy of the off‐line setup correction compared to the NAL protocol. The combination of the fixed vertical couch position protocol, for correction of the anteroposterior setup error, and the fixed‐action–level protocol with 2.5 mm correction threshold, for correction of the mediolateral and the superior–inferior setup errors, was proved to provide adequate and comparable patient setup accuracy in WBRT and WBRT with additional LN irradiation.PACS numbers: 87.53.Kn, 87.57.‐s

Highlights

  • The standard treatment of early-stage breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery followed by fractionated conformal whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT)

  • Regional lymph node (LN) irradiation in addition to WBRT (i.e., WBRT-LN) improves disease-free and metastases-free survival of patients with stage I-III breast cancer.(1) Variations in daily patient setup are compensated by prescribing the dose to the planning target volume (PTV) (i.e., a 3D expansion of the clinical target volume (CTV)).(2) Large PTV margins, increase the dose delivered to the surrounding healthy tissues

  • Whole-breast radiotherapy with and without additional lymph node irradiation Twenty consecutive WBRT patients and 20 consecutive WBRT-LN patients were scanned in the treatment position: supine on a Posiboard-2 breastboard (Civco Medical Solutions, Orange City, IA), with the arms raised above the head and with an immobilization wedge under the knees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The standard treatment of early-stage breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery followed by fractionated conformal whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT). With Monte Carlo simulations they have shown that to halve the systematic setup error, the NAL protocol only requires [3,4,5] imaged fractions, while the SAL protocol needs [8,9] imaged fractions. Due to this superiority, the NAL protocol has an extensive application in WBRT with high resulting setup accuracy.(6-8)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.