Abstract
This randomized, investigator-blind, parallel-group trial compared erythromycin acistrate (EA) and erythromycin base (EB) in the treatment of elderly patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In total, 57 hospitalized patients were included, of whom 28 received EA 400 mg three times daily, and 29 EB 500 mg three times daily for 10-21 days. The mean age of the patients was 70 and 68 years in the EA and EB groups, respectively. The patients underwent medical examination before the onset of the study, at the 7th day during the treatment and 3-5 days after termination of the treatment. The efficacy assessment was based on clinical signs and symptoms of infection as well as on bacteriological culture from sputum samples. 55% of the patients in the EA group and 61% in the EB group were totally cured, 23 and 29%, respectively, had only mild symptoms at the end of the therapy and 14 versus 11% of the patients did not respond at all. The predominant pathogens isolated from sputum were Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. 60% of the patients in the EA group and 46% in the EB group from whom a sample was taken had normal flora in the posttreatment culture. In the EA group, 8 patients and in the EB group 7 patients complained of gastrointestinal side effects and 4 and 1, respectively, discontinued the treatment prematurely. Slight, reversible elevations of one or more liver parenchymal enzyme activities during and after treatment were seen at the same frequency in both treatment groups. The results show that EA is as effective and well tolerated as EB in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in elderly patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.