Efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in adults: A prospective, unblinded randomized controlled trial

Abstract

PurposeControlled randomized studies recommending the clinical use of lamotrigine in adult populations with the diagnosis of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy are still lacking. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine versus valproate in adult patients with JME. MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, pragmatic, long-term and open-label treatment trial. Patients were randomized to use valproate or lamotrigine. The primary end points of the study were: (1) time from randomization to treatment failure (withdrawal); (2) time from randomization to seizures remission. Secondary ending points were: (1) frequency of clinically important adverse events and (2) change in the QOLIE-31 after randomization. The definition of seizure remission was based on disappearance of all seizure types and EEG discharges. ResultsWe found that the time to withdraw treatment after randomization was not significantly different in lamotrigine and valproate groups. Long-term seizures freedom was equal in the both groups of the trial; only 8 (19.1%) patients randomized to lamotrigine and 6 (19.4%) randomized to valproate were not seizure free after 4 months of treatment. Between 17.03% (lamotrigine) and 35.3% (valproate) of patients reported adverse reactions at some point in the intention-to treat study (p=0.07). All subscales of the QOLIE-31 questionnaire, except that related to side effects of medication, improved more than 5 points with respect to baseline period in both groups ConclusionLamotrigine is effective in adult patients with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy and better tolerated than valproate, although the incidence of idiosyncratic reactions could be a cause of concern.