Efficacy and Safety of Valemetostat Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas: Primary Results of the Phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 Study

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), with limited available treatment options for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Valemetostat tosylate (valemetostat) is a novel and potent dual inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH)2 and EZH1, which is approved in Japan for the treatment of R/R adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). Here, we report primary results for pts with R/R PTCL treated with valemetostat in the open-label, single-arm, global, phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 study (DS3201-A-U202; NCT04703192). Methods: Pts were ≥ 18 years of age, had a confirmed diagnosis of PTCL, had R/R disease after ≥ 1 prior line of systemic therapy, and pts with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) had received prior brentuximab vedotin treatment. Pts received oral valemetostat 200 mg/day in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by blinded independent central review of PTCL following computed tomography (CT)-based response assessment according to Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT-based response assessment by Lugano 2014 criteria was an exploratory endpoint. Efficacy analyses included all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat and had an eligible PTCL subtype confirmed by central hematopathology review; safety analyses included all pts who received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat. Results: A total of 133 pts with R/R PTCL were enrolled and received ≥ 1 dose of valemetostat. Pts had a median age of 69 years (range 22-85) and 91 pts (68.4%) were male. Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-12) and 35 pts (26.3%) received prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT; autologous, n = 32; allogeneic, n = 5). PTCL subtype eligibility was confirmed in 119 pts: 42 pts (31.6%) had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 41 (30.8%) had PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), 9 (6.8%) had ALCL (7 [5.3%] ALK-negative and 2 [1.5%] ALK-positive), 8 (6.0%) had nodal PTCL with T follicular helper cell phenotype, and 19 (14.3%) had other PTCL subtypes. As of data cutoff (May 5, 2023), 32 pts (24.1%) were still receiving treatment; reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive or relapsed disease in 46 pts (34.6%), clinical progression in 19 pts (14.3%), adverse event in 13 pts (9.8%), and 12 pts (9.0%) discontinued study drug to proceed with allogeneic HCT. Median treatment duration was 18 weeks (range 0.3-93.4) and median duration of follow-up was 10.5 months (range 0.2-21.5). Among 119 efficacy-evaluable pts, the CT-based ORR was 43.7% (n = 52) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.6-53.1), including 17 pts (14.3%) achieving CR and 35 pts (29.4%) achieving PR as best overall response. Median DOR was 11.9 months (95% CI, 7.8-not evaluable [NE]) and median time to response was 8.1 weeks (range 5-37). ORR by PTCL subtype ranged from 31.7% for PTCL, NOS to 54.8% for AITL (Table 1). Using PET-CT-based response assessment, ORR was 52.1% (n = 62) (95% CI, 42.8-61.3), including 32 pts (26.9%) with a complete metabolic response. Median CT-based PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-8.3) and median OS was 17.0 months (95% CI, 13.5-NE). Of 133 pts in the safety analysis set, 128 pts (96.2%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade, 77 pts (57.9%) experienced grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, and 53 pts (39.8%) experienced serious adverse events. The most common all grade and grade ≥ 3 TEAE was thrombocytopenia (Table 2). Overall, 13 pts (9.8%) experienced a TEAE that led to treatment discontinuation, 21 pts (15.8%) had a TEAE that led to dose reduction, and 66 pts (49.6%) had a TEAE that led to dose interruption. Conclusions: Valemetostat demonstrated a high ORR of 43.7% with durable responses (median DOR of 11.9 months) in pts with R/R PTCL, and responses were observed across all PTCL subtypes. A valemetostat dose of 200 mg/day was tolerable; safety analysis showed that the most common TEAEs were cytopenias. These primary results from the VALENTINE-PTCL01 study suggest that valemetostat provides a clinically meaningful benefit for pts with R/R PTCL.