Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Procedures for Congenital Moderate and Severe Blepharoptosis: A Network Meta-analysis.

Abstract

There are various surgical approaches to treat congenital moderate and severe blepharoptosis (CMSBP), but their efficacy and safety remain unclear owing to a lack of high-level evidence. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 classical operations: and their modifications frontal muscle flap suspension (FMS), levator palpebrae muscle shortening (LMS), conjoint fascial sheath suspension (CFSS), and modified CFSS. We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases until March 2022. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted for the 5 most common treatments. Outcome indicators were the number of patients with good correction and adverse events. Twenty-one studies were included, with 2402 eyes in 1863 patients. Five surgical methods were evaluated: FMS, LMS, CFSS, and conjoint fascial sheath suspension combined with levator muscle shortening (CFSS+LMS), or with levator palpebrae muscle composite flap suspension (CFS+L). Meta-analysis indicated that CFSS is more effective than LMS and FMS, but inferior to CFSS+LMS and CFS+L. Efficacy rates of CFSS+LMS and CFS+L were comparable. Frontal muscle flap suspension was more effective than LMS. Safety data meta-analysis found CFSS safer than FMS and LMS but with more complications than CFSS+LMS and CFS+L. Complication rates were comparable between CFS+L and CFSS+LMS, and also for FMS and LMS. When correcting CMSBP, CFSS+LMS, and CFS+L may be better therapeutic strategies for effectiveness and safety. Conjoint fascial sheath suspension also yielded good surgical effects. Plastic surgeons should be cautious about LMS and FMS. Level IV.