Abstract

SummaryBackground Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

Highlights

  • The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC), including intrahepatic bile duct cancer (IHC), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHC), gallbladder cancer (GBC), and ampullary cancer, is increasing worldwide, this condition is still rare [1]

  • The combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) demonstrated a survival benefit compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in the ABC-02 study [3] and the BT-22 study [4]

  • In the second-line treatment for BTC, FOLFOX significantly improved overall survival compared with active symptom control in a randomized phase III trial (ABC-06) [7], and is described as being a preferred regimen in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC), including intrahepatic bile duct cancer (IHC), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHC), gallbladder cancer (GBC), and ampullary cancer, is increasing worldwide, this condition is still rare [1]. BTC is relatively common in Japan, where it is the sixth leading cause of death [2]. For unresectable and recurrent BTC, systemic chemotherapy is the only effective treatment. The combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) demonstrated a survival benefit compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in the ABC-02 study [3] and the BT-22 study [4]. GC has been recommended as a standard first-line therapy for unresectable and recurrent BTC in several sets of guidelines [5, 6]. In the second-line treatment for BTC, FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) significantly improved overall survival compared with active symptom control in a randomized phase III trial (ABC-06) [7], and is described as being a preferred regimen in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines [6]. Oxaliplatin is not approved for BTC in Japan.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call