Abstract

The role of rituximab in the first-line treatment of low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL) has been supported by a large number of data. However, whether rituximab biosimilars have the same efficacy and safety as the reference drug (MabThera) is still controversial. Electronic databases and the ClinicalTrail.gov website were extensively searched using relevant search criteria. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoB 2 assessment scale, and the RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used for meta-analysis. A total of 1223 patients were included in four clinical randomized controlled trials. There was no statistical difference in efficacy between biosimilars and MabThera groups (the objective response rate: RR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.93-1.08, p=0.92; the progression-free survival: RR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.96-1.12, p=0.30; the overall survival: RR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.03, p=0.76; the serious adverse events: RR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.69-1.89, p=0.59; the infusion-related reaction: RR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.09, p=0.32). In terms of safety, there was also no significant difference between two groups. Our study concluded that the efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars in the treatment of LTB-FL are highly similar to those of the original drug.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.