Efficacy and Safety of Novel Beta-Chitin Patches as Haemostat in Rat Vascular and Neurosurgical Model.

Abstract

BackgroundIntraoperative hemorrhage is a major cause of poor post-operative outcome. Beta-chitin patch has previously been found to be an effective haemostat, but whether modifying the patch can improve its efficacy and safety, remains unknown. In this study, beta-chitin patches were modified using polyethylene oxide, Pluronic-F127 (Chi/F127), calcium (Chi/20%Ca), increased thickness (Chi/Thick) or polyphosphate (Chi/PP).ObjectiveUsing rat (Wistar Albino; 8–10 weeks old) vascular and neurosurgical models, this project investigated and compared the efficacy and safety of beta-chitin patches with gauze, Surgicel and FloSeal.MethodsNinety rats underwent a standardized femoral artery injury and were randomized to receive either beta-chitin patches, gauze, Surgicel or FloSeal. The bleeding time and total blood loss was measured. For the neurosurgical model, forty-four rats underwent a standardized cortical injury and randomization to a treatment group. Following a 48 h recovery period, their brains were collected for histopathological examination.ResultsThe mean bleeding time with Chitin (120.8 s) and Chi/PP (117.3 s) was ~60 s lower than Chi/F127, Chi/20%Ca and Chi/Thick (p < 0.05). Chitin and Chi/PP had a significantly lower bleeding time than FloSeal (174.2 s) (p < 0.05), but not Surgicel (172.7 s). Gauze (400 s) had a significantly higher bleeding time compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the total blood loss between the groups. Histopathological examination of brains found no adverse inflammatory reaction to any of the haemostatic compounds.ConclusionChi/PP had superior haemostatic efficacy compared to Surgicel and FloSeal, but not compared to non-modified beta-chitin patch. All of the haemostats were equally safe.