Abstract

BackgroundLenvatinib and lenvatinib-based combination treatments are widely used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice, but their curative effect and safety need further study in the real world.MethodsThis was a retrospective study involving patients with uHCC receiving lenvatinib monotherapy and lenvatinib-based combination treatment between Nov, 2018 and Sep, 2020 in Nanfang Hospital. Efficacy was evaluated with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and graded. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy were compared. Stratified analysis was performed according to systemic line of treatment and medication regimen for combination therapy.ResultsFor lenvatinib monotherapy (n = 39), OS and PFS were 80 weeks and 24.3 weeks, respectively. For combination treatment (n = 72), median OS and PFS were 99 weeks and 45.6 weeks, respectively. OS, PFS, and TTP for patients in the combination treatment cohort were significantly longer compared to those of patients in the monotreatment cohort (OS: P = 0.04, PFS: P = 0.003; TTP, P = 0.005). The incidence of TRAEs could be controlled both in the monotherapy cohort and the combination treatment cohort. In the monotherapy cohort, OS and PFS were significantly decreased in the second-line treatment group compared with the first-line treatment group, while no differences were observed in the combination cohort. The efficacy of triple therapy (lenvatinib plus PD-1 antibody plus TACE or HAIF) was similar to lenvatinib plus PD-1 antibody or lenvatinib plus TACE or HAIF.ConclusionsOur real-world study showed that lenvatinib monotherapy and lenvatinib-based combination therapy were well tolerated, with encouraging efficacies in patients with uHCC. Lenvatinib-based combination therapy showed a better curative effect compared with lenvatinib single-agent therapy. In patients who have failed first-line TKI treatment, lenvatinib-based combination therapy may be a better choice than lenvatinib single-agent therapy. Lenvatinib-based triple therapy may not have an advantage over dual therapy.

Highlights

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor associated with high morbidity and mortality and represents a major public health issue

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment, lenvatinib-based combination therapy may be a better choice than lenvatinib single-agent therapy

  • Lenvatinib has proven to be superior to sorafenib in increasing the overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC in clinical trials, its effect is limited by drug resistance as well as its intolerable side effects [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor associated with high morbidity and mortality and represents a major public health issue. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used in advanced unresectable HCC (uHCC). Lenvatinib is a novel TKI for the first-line treatment of HCC, which gained approval in 2018. Lenvatinib has proven to be superior to sorafenib in increasing the overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC in clinical trials, its effect is limited by drug resistance as well as its intolerable side effects [4]. Several drugs have been approved for the treatment of HCC in recent years, these drugs are not satisfactory owing to their associated toxicities and the rapid development of drug resistance. Lenvatinib and lenvatinib-based combination treatments are widely used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice, but their curative effect and safety need further study in the real world

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call