Efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: evidences from direct and indirect comparisons.

Abstract

To date, it remains challenging for clinicians to make informed decisions about which dosage of erenumab is more effective for treating adult patients with migraine. Thus, we sought to examine the safety and efficacy of different doses of erenumab in this group of patients. We searched several databases from inception to May 31, 2021, irrespective of language. We included only RCTs that compared erenumab 70mg, erenumab 140mg, and placebo in migraine patients. The primary efficacy outcome was change in monthly migraine days (MMDs). The primary safety outcome was defined as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). We reported relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) from the analysis. Overall, eight trials comprising 4281 participants were included in this study. Network meta-analysis showed that both erenumab 70mg (MD: - 1.43, 95% CrI: - 1.71 to - 1.16) and erenumab 140mg (MD: - 1.78, 95% CrI: - 2.21 to - 1.45) were associated with decreased MMDs. Also, erenumab 140mg was associated with significantly lower MMDs than erenumab 70mg (MD: - 0.34, 95% CrI: - 0.68 to - 0.01). In terms of primary safety outcome, neither erenumab 70mg (RR: 0.98, 95% CrI: 0.92 to 1.05) nor erenumab 140mg (RR: 0.99, 95% CrI: 0.91 to 1.07) was associated with increased risk of TEAEs. The results from this study suggested erenumab 140mg might provide better efficacy than 70mg among adult patients with migraine, without increasing TEAEs. Future elaborated RCTs with a larger number of participants are warranted to validate these discoveries.