Abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of neoplasm-related death in the United States. Several studies analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with different chemotherapy regimens consisting on drugs such as 5-FU, capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MethodsSeveral databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CENTRAL. The primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Data extracted from the studies were combined by using hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI).ResultsThe final analysis included 9 trials comprising 3,914 patients. Patients who received the combined treatment (chemotherapy + bevacizumab) had higher response rates (RR = 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.82 to 0.96; p = 0.003) with heterogeneity, higher progression-free survival (HR = 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.63 to 0.75; p < 0.00001) and also higher overall survival rates (HR = 0.87; 95 % CI: 0.80 to 0.95; p = 0.002) with moderate heterogeneity. Regarding adverse events and severe toxicities (grade ≥ 3), the group receiving the combined therapy had higher rates of hypertension (RR = 3.56 95 % CI: 2.58 to 4.92; p < 0.00001), proteinuria (RR = 1.89; 95 % CI: 1.26 to 2.84; p = 0.002), gastrointestinal perforation (RR = 3.63; 95 % CI: 1.31 to 10.09; p = 0.01), any thromboembolic events (RR = 1.44; 95 % CI: 1.20 to 1.73; p = 0.0001), and bleeding (RR = 1.81; 95 % CI: 1.22 to 2.67; p = 0.003).ConclusionThe combination of chemotherapy with bevacizumab increased the response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with mCRC without prior chemotherapy. The results of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparatively higher in those subgroups of patients receiving bolus 5-FU or capecitabine-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, when compared to patients treated with infusional %-FU plus bevacizumab (no difference in PFS and OS). Regarding the type of cytotoxic scheme, regimens containing irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy showed superior efficacy results when combined to bevacizumab.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2734-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of neoplasm-related death in the United States

  • A comprehensive analysis was performed regarding the presence of relevant biomarkers, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A isoform or KRAS status, which might have predicted superior efficacy for patients treated with bevacizumab or other particular regimens

  • Our results demonstrated that the overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were higher in patients who received the combination of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in a fixed effects model analysis, but with heterogeneity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of neoplasm-related death in the United States. Since its introduction by Heidelberger in 1957, 5fluorouracil (5-FU) has become one of the most extensively used drugs in the treatment of mCRC worldwide and the backbone of most the recommended and researched chemotherapy associations [7,8,9]. Capecitabine, another oral fluoropyrimidine, is currently recommended as an alternative for the treatment of these patients since its similar efficacy to 5-FU was demonstrated in randomized studies [10]. Two other cytotoxic drugs (irinotecan and oxaliplatin) had their efficacy confirmed in the treatment of mCRC, becoming part of treatment protocols since 1999 [7, 11,12,13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call