Efficacy and safety of arterial FOLFOX chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis.

Abstract

e16189 Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 [PD-(L)1] immunotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy (SCT) plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). Methods: In this retrospective study, unresectable treatment-naive ICC patients who were treated with HAIC plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy [HAIC+αPD-(L)1] or SCT plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy [SCT+αPD-(L)1] were included. The clinical characteristics, therapeutic outcomes and adverse events (AEs) of patients between the two groups were compared. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize biases between groups. Results: From January 2019 to January 2023, a total of 182 patients were enrolled, including 147 patients in HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group and 35 patients in SCT+αPD-(L)1 group. After PSM, 61 and 26 patients were included in the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 and SCT+αPD-(L)1 groups, respectively. The HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group showed longer median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) than the SCT+αPD-(L)1 group (OS: 14.5 vs 10.5 months, P = 0.019; PFS: 6.4 vs 10.1 months, P = 0.020). The disease control rate of HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group were higher than those of SCT+αPD-(L)1 group (91.8% vs 69.2%, P = 0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the two groups, but the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group showed a lower incidence of grade 3~4 AEs related to anemia, weight loss and fatigue. Conclusions: HAIC plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy had acceptable toxic effects and might improve outcomes compared to SCT plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with uICC.