Efficacy and safety of afatinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A real-world study based meta-analysis.

Abstract

e21134 Background: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of Afatinib in advanced EGFR mutation NSCLC patients based on real-world evidence. We also explore the effectiveness of tolerability-guided dose reduction on outcomes in the real-world setting. Methods: Eligible real-world studies from Pubmed, Emabse and Cochrane Library were included in this study. The quality assessment of the included studies was based on the guidelines of Cochrane. Then heterogeneity analysis was performed based on Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistics. Results: A total of twenty-five studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis. Meanwhile, nine studies were included in qualitative descriptive analysis. The efficacy of DCR and ORR were 87.6 % (81.5, 92.7) and 58.9 % (48.8, 68.7). The pooled medium PFS was 12.45 months (10.36, 14.54), medium TTF was 15.42 months (13.62, 17.22) and medium OS was 31.67 (26.78, 36.56) months. The efficacy of afatinib in first-line only group was superior than those in second-line. The total incidence of adverse events for diarrhea, mucositis and skin rashes were 70.4 (60.1, 79.8)%, 36.5 (29.5, 43.8)% and 71.4 (64.4, 77.9)%, respectively. Meanwhile, the serious adverse reactions (Grade ≥3) for diarrhea, mucositis and skin rashes were 9.7 (6.8, 13.1)%, 2.1 (1.0, 3.6)% and 5.8 (4.5, 7.2)%, respectively. Furthermore, the different for PFS and OS between afatinib non-full dose group ( < 40mg) and full dose group ( > 40mg) was not significant (P < 0.05). however, the ORR in full dose group was 78.5 % (66.7, 88.4), which was significantly higher in the non-full dose group 67.8 % (56.8, 77.9). Conclusions: Afatinib was a safe and effective TKI for real-world EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, which was consistent with the results of RCT. Tolerability-guided dose adjustment might affect the efficacy of afatinib in real-world setting.