Efficacy and prognosis of sequential 2G ALK-TKI in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC after crizotinib resistance: A real-world single-center research.

Abstract

e21075 Background: Advanced-stage anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive (ALK[+]) NSCLC has significantly benefited from ALK-TKI. It is still uncertain which second-generation(2G) ALK-TKI will benefit patients more after crizotinib resistance. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment history of 104 patients with ALK[+] NSCLC. Grouping was determined according to the type of 2G TKI patients selected after failure of crizotinib, including systemic and intracranial. Results: Overall, the median follow-up time was 24.2 (95%CI: 21.3-27.1) months, and 45(43.2%) eligible patients were alive at the end of follow-up. After Crizotinib treatment failure, 91(87.5%) patients received subsequent therapy (including targeted therapy and chemotherapy), and 90.1% (82/91) of patients received sequential 2G TKI treatment, with overall ORR of 68.3%, mPFS of 13.4 (95%CI:10.0-16.7) months, and mOS of 26.3 (95%CI:11.6-41.1) months. The mOS for Alectinib, Ceritinib, and Brigatinib were 34.5 (95%CI: 14.8-54.3), 19.4 (95%CI: 11.8-27.0) and 43.8 (95%CI: 10.0-77.6) months, respectively. The mPFS of Alectinib, Ceritinib, Brigatinib and Ensartinib were 17.3 (95%CI: 12.9-21.8) months, 13.4 (95%CI: 9.5-17.8) months, 10.7 (95%CI: 6.6-14.9) months and 8.4 (95%CI: 1.3-14.8) months, ORR were 68.6%, 70.8%, 69.2% and 60.0%, respectively (Table.1). For crizotinib resistant patient, 2G TKI showed no significant difference in prolonging PFS (P = 0.599) and OS (P = 0.681). Brain metastases were found in 67.1% (55/82) of crizotinib resistant patients, and mPFS of Alectinib, Ceritinib, Brigatinib and Ensartinib were 22.1 (95%CI:9.6-30.6) months, 12.6 (95%CI:8.3-16.9) months, 21.0 (95%CI:0.5-45.7) months and 14.7 (95%CI:3.8-25.5) months; ORR were 72.4%, 50.0%, 66.7% and 40.0%, respectively (Table.1). In particular, the ORR of Alectinib and Brigatinib was significantly higher than that of Ceritinib and Ensartinib (P < 0.000), while the mPFS of Alectinib was significantly better than Ensartinib (P = 0.029). Conclusions: After crizotinib resistance, nearly 90% of patients choose sequential 2G TKI. There was no significant difference in mPFS and mOS among patients treated with different 2G ALK-TKI. For patients with CNS metastases, treatment with Alectinib and Brigatinib results in higher ORR and PFS.[Table: see text]