Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and vision-threatening complications of brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 (106Ru) plaque to treat uveal melanoma.Material and methodsA literature review was performed based on results from searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, using the following key words: “choroidal melanoma”, “uveal melanoma”, “brachytherapy”, and “ruthenium-106”. We included studies performed on more than 30 patients since 1986, reporting on local control rate, complications rate, mean radiation dose, and mean tumor thickness. The cumulative analysis was performed using Metaprop command of Stata v.16, and meta-regression was conducted based on mean tumor thickness and mean radiation dose to tumor’s apex.ResultsTwenty-one retrospective studies were selected, involving 3,913 patients treated primarily with 106Ru plaque brachytherapy. The range of radiation dose to tumor apex was from 70 Gy to 250 Gy. The local control rate following brachytherapy ranged from 59% to 98%, and the overall weighted mean of local control was 84%. However, the heterogeneity between studies’ reports was remarkable (I2 = 95.40%). Meta-regression based on tumor thickness and mean dose of radiation to the apex showed that the studies’ heterogeneity was minimally related to the difference in mean tumor size (I2 = 92%). The correlation between larger tumor size and lower local control rate was statistically significant (p-value = 0.024). There was no significant correlation between the mean radiation dose and local control rate (p-value = 0.679). The most commonly reported complications were cataract and radiation-related retinopathy.ConclusionsAlthough the studies’ heterogeneity was high, in a prescription dose ranging from 70 Gy to 250 Gy to the tumor apex, 106Ru brachytherapy seems to be successful in local control of uveal melanoma. The efficacy of 106Ru in controlling uveal melanomas decreased with the increase in tumor thickness. However, these outcomes should be verified in randomized comparative studies.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
