Abstract

Pertussis vaccine development has mainly focused on Bordetella pertussis, and consequently these vaccines contain B. pertussis antigens only. However, the related species Bordetella parapertussis can also cause pertussis, although symptoms associated with the disease are generally considered to be milder. Recent field studies have shown that in some outbreaks B. parapertussis can prevail. Using a mouse model we compared the efficacy against B. parapertussis of two commercially available acellular vaccines and two whole cell vaccines, used in The Netherlands and Finland, respectively. The efficacies of the two whole cell vaccines against B. parapertussis were similar, but much lower compared to the efficacy against B. pertussis. Although, the acellular vaccines conferred some protection against B. parapertussis early in infection, the values were not significant. Later in infection, a highly significant enhancement of colonisation by B. parapertussis was observed in mice vaccinated with acellular vaccines. The whole cell vaccines protected significantly better than the acellular vaccines against B. parapertussis. The possible consequences of a switch from whole cell to acellular vaccines was discussed in the light of our findings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.