Efferent terminals in the cochlea of the mustached bat: Quantitative data

Abstract

Efferent terminals in the cochlea of the mustached bat were stained for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and quantitative data were obtained for the number and size of the endings on the outer hair cells (OHCs) in each row, from base to apex. From TEM micrographs and AChE-stained, surface preparations it was determined that every OHC had a single, large terminal. The mean size of the terminals was significantly different in each row, with the largest occurring in the first row (7.1 μm 2); the mean size in the second and third rows was 5.7 and 5.0 μm 2 respectively. In specific frequency processing regions, the largest mean size (8.4 μm 2) for first row OHCs was consistently found in the distal densely innervated (DDI) area. This region has afferent neurons that are sharply tuned to the second harmonic, constant frequency component of the bat's biosonar signals. Sudden changes in the size of the terminals were observed exactly at the boundaries of the DDI with adjacent sparsely innervated regions. Similar, but less striking, size changes also occurred in and adjacent to the proximal densely innervated (PDI) region, a harmonically related, sharply tuned region, which processes the bat's 91.5 kHz, third harmonic, constant frequency signals. The region of the cochlea with the smallest first row terminals (mean 5.3 μm 2) was the large, sparsely innervated region of the basal turn, a region that does not appear to process biosonar signals. Although the significance of differences in efferent terminal size is not known, the data suggest a possible correlation between OHC stimulation and sharp tuning. The potentially greater influence of the efferent fibers on the first row of OHCs, compared to other rows, is consistent with observations made on other mammals; in the latter, however, the greater influence has been suggested more by number than size. Unlike other mammals, the OHC efferents in the mustached bat have no clear base-to-apex gradient in the number or size of the efferent terminals. It is suggested that this might reflect the high frequency nature of the ear (6–120 kHz) and absence of low frequency hearing.