Effectuation of International Academy of Cytology Yokahama Reporting System of Breast Cytology to Assess Malignancy Risk and Accuracy

Background: Worldwide breast malignancy is the major cause for mortality among women. Screening and early detection are crucial. Grey zones of uncertainty in cytomorphological differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be overcome by Yokohama system of classification. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) To categorize Breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples according to the international academy of cytology (IAC) Yokohama system. (2) To assess the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 144 breast FNAC cases with histopathological diagnosis was done based on Yokohama System from January 2018 to December 2020. ROM in each category was calculated. The study results were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) considering histological diagnosis as the gold standard. Results: Recategorization of 144 cases with histopathological diagnosis was done according to Yokohama system as insufficient material, benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. The respective ROM for each category was, 7.6% for Category-1 (Insufficient), 15.26% for Category-2 (Benign), 65.38% for Category-3 (Atypical), 83.33% for Category-4 (Suspicious), and 99.18% for Category-5 (Malignant). Considering malignant cases as positive, sensitivity – 86.75%, specificity – 97.32%, PPV – 99.19%, NPV – 66.06%, and accuracy of 88.96% were deduced. Conclusion: Incorporation of IAC Yokohama system to categorize breast cytopathology using uniform terminologies provides diagnostic clarity, consistency, and accuracy in reporting, which in turn helps the clinician to predict the ROM and patient outcome.

Background: Worldwide breast malignancy is the major cause for mortality among women. Screening and early detection are crucial. Grey zones of uncertainty in cytomorphological differentiation of benign from malignant lesions can be overcome by Yokohama system of classification. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) To categorize Breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples according to the international academy of cytology (IAC) Yokohama system. (2) To assess the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 144 breast FNAC cases with histopathological diagnosis was done based on Yokohama System from January 2018 to December 2020. ROM in each category was calculated. The study results were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) considering histological diagnosis as the gold standard. Results: Recategorization of 144 cases with histopathological diagnosis was done according to Yokohama system as insufficient material, benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. The respective ROM for each category was, 7.6% for Category-1 (Insufficient), 15.26% for Category-2 (Benign), 65.38% for Category-3 (Atypical), 83.33% for Category-4 (Suspicious), and 99.18% for Category-5 (Malignant). Considering malignant cases as positive, sensitivity – 86.75%, specificity – 97.32%, PPV – 99.19%, NPV – 66.06%, and accuracy of 88.96% were deduced. Conclusion: Incorporation of IAC Yokohama system to categorize breast cytopathology using uniform terminologies provides diagnostic clarity, consistency, and accuracy in reporting, which in turn helps the clinician to predict the ROM and patient outcome.

Introduction: Breast cancer affects 2.1 million women each year and is the most common cancer among females, followed by lung, colorectum, uterus, and cervix. Breast cancer accounted for 6,26,679 (6.6%) deaths in 2018. Breast cancer incidence is on the rise in every part of the globe, including developed countries. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) shows high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in evaluation of breast lesions. FNAC is part of the triple test and is the gold standard for assessment. The new reporting system for breast FNAC, proposed by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama Breast Cytopathology System, has standardised the reporting system to categorise breast lesions and as unmasked the diagnostic dilemma faced by reporting cytopathologist. Aim: The study aimed to categorise the samples according to IAC Yokohama Breast Cytopathology System and assess the Risk of Malignancy (ROM) for each category and increase the diagnostic yield of breast FNAC. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 1,467 breast FNAC cases, which were retrieved and reclassified based on the newly proposed IAC Yokohama System into five categories during January 2017-December 2018 in Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology (KMIO), Bangalore. Histopathology correlation was done, and the Risk of Malignancy (ROM) was assessed whenever possible. The study results were analysed using Microsoft excel 2007, sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and accuracy ratios were calculated using the MedCalc diagnostic test evaluation calculator, keeping histologic diagnosis as the gold standard. Results: Re-categorisation of 1,467 cases was done according to the Yokohama breast cytopathology system as insufficient material, benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. The histopathology diagnosis was available in 1,069 cases. The respective ROM for each category was, 7.6% for category 1 (Insufficient), 15.26% for category 2 (Benign), 65.38% for category 3 (Atypical), 83.33% for category 4 (Suspicious) and 99.18% for category 5 (Malignant). Considering malignant cases as positive, sensitivity-86.75%, specificity-97.32%, PPV-99.19%, NPV-66.06% and accuracy of 88.96% was deduced. Conclusion: It is recommended to incorporate the IAC Yokohama system to categorise breast cytopathology with uniform terminologies. This will help diagnose breast lesions more consistently and accurately, which in turn helps the clinician manage the disease and predict the ROM and the patient outcome.

Recently the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) introduced a new reporting system for breast fine-needle aspiration cytology that classifies cytologic diagnoses into five-categories: (I) insufficient material, (II) benign, (III) atypical, (IV) suspicious of malignancy, and (V) malignant. The current study was undertaken to categorize the breast lesions utilizing the newly proposed IAC Yokohama classification system and evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for respective categories and the diagnostic yield of this technique. All FNAs of breast lesions over 2.5 years were categorized retrospectively using the newly proposed IAC Yokohama reporting system. The ROM was calculated along with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, false positive, and false-negative rate using the histological diagnosis as the gold standard. The 512 cases were distributed as follows: Category I (insufficient material) 7.4%, Category II (benign) 74%, Category III (atypical) 5.7%, Category IV(suspicious) 1.4%, and Category V (malignant) 11.5%. Histopathological correlation was available in 285 (55.7%) cases. The respective ROM calculated was 33.3%, 0.5%, 13.3%, 83.3%, and 100% for Category I-V. The Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value, and Diagnostic accuracy were 95%, 99.5%, 98.27%, 98.6, and 98.5% respectively. Despite previous attempts to establish a standardized diagnostic terminology, there has been a lack of a single internationally approved standardized reporting system allowing substantial diagnostic clarity and incorporating distinct diagnostic categories, each linked with a specific ROM and recommended management. This System also provides enhanced communication between pathologists and attending clinicians for the benefit of the patient.

Background: Breast lumps pose a significant health concern globally, contributing to both illness and death. The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system has established a uniform method for reporting breast cytology, categorizing it into five groups: inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant. Aims and Objectives: This study primarily aimed to evaluate breast lesions using the IAC Yokohama System and compare the results with those of corresponding histopathological biopsies. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and determine the risk of malignancy associated with each category. Materials and Methods: In this study, 92 cases were analyzed and categorized according to the IAC Yokohama System. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy were determined based on histopathological diagnosis, which was considered the reference standard. Results: Among the 92 breast FNACs, the risk of malignancy for the categories insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant were 0%, 0%, 18.75%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The highest sensitivity (100%) was achieved when considering atypical, suspicious, and malignant cases as positive results. The specificity was highest (100%) when only malignant or both malignant and suspicious cases were considered positive results. The highest diagnostic accuracy (95.65%) was observed when including malignant and suspicious cases as positive results. Conclusion: Implementing the IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology through structured reporting will enhance the quality, clarity, and reproducibility of reports among pathologists and clinicians, which would result in enhanced patient care and management.

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System has developed a standardized system of reporting breast cytology. The current study aimed to apply the newly proposed YOKOHAMA classification system along with American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system (ACR-BI-RADS) scoring to breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) cases from the department archives and to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. All breast FNACs done between January 20017 and June 2023 were reclassified according to the proposed IAC Yokohama reporting system. Histopathological correlation of the IAC Yokohama system and BI-RADS was done wherever available. A three-category approach was followed based on benign versus malignant, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated using histopathology as the gold standard. A total of 2130 breast FNACs were performed, of which 469 had a histopathological correlation and 892 had a BI-RADS correlation. The ROM for insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant categories were 29.16%, 3.28%, 28.57%, 100%, and 92.18%, respectively. Maximum specificity (96.8%) was observed when only malignant (cat A) and when both suspicious and malignant cases (Cat B) were taken as positive test results. Highest sensitivity (92.7%) was achieved when atypical, suspicious, and malignant cases were taken as positive test results (Cat C) and highest diagnostic accuracy (94.8%) was seen in category B. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of BI-ADS were 78.67%, 92%, 85.5%, 87.8%, and 87%, respectively. FNAC and imaging are the key modalities for diagnosing breast lesions. The IAC Yokohama system along with ACR-BI-RADS provides a simple yet useful approach for effectively categorizing the different breast lesions, which is useful for patient management and risk stratification.

Introduction:The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) has developed a comprehensive and systematic method that defines five categories for reporting breast fine needle aspiration cytology. These categories stratify breast lesions by their risk of malignancy, providing guidance on management for each category. The aim of the study is to analyze the diagnostic utility of the IAC Yokohama system in breast cytology reporting with histopathological correlation.Methods:This was a cross-sectional observational study. The study included 55 patients with clinically suspected breast lumps who underwent Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for provisional diagnosis, which was later confirmed by corresponding excisional biopsy and histopathology. The collected data following Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and histopathology were entered into Microsoft Office Excel software 13. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16. For diagnostic measurement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. The probability of significance was set at the 5% level.Results:Among 55 cases of breast lesions on cytopathology as per the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System, none of the cases were categorized as Insufficient (C1). Twenty-five cases (45.5%) were categorized as C2 (benign), 5 cases (9.1%) were categorized as C3 (atypia, probably benign), 4 cases (7.3%) were categorized as C4 (suspicious for malignancy), and 21 cases (38.3%) were categorized as C5 (malignant). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for cytopathology compared with histopathology were 86.21% (95% CI: 73.76%–98.66%), 100% (95% CI: 100%–100%), 100% (95% CI: 100%–100%), 86.67% (95% CI: 74.29%–99.05%), and 92.7% (95% CI: 85.54%–99.93%), respectively.Conclusion:The IAC Yokohama system for reporting breast fine needle aspiration cytopathology effectively stratifies patients into five categories and has high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy with regard to the gold standard histopathology.

Background/Objectives: 1) To categorize the Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) samples according to this new system of reporting. 2) To assess the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of breast FNA and calculate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology (FNAB) obtained between January 2019 to December 2019 and were reclassified according to the newly proposed IAC Yokohama reporting system. Only cases for which histopathological reports were available were included in the study. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category was determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were evaluated based on a three-category approach. Results: A total of 63 women were included in the study. The samples were distributed as follows: insufficient material 0, benign 34.9%, atypical 3.18%, suspicious for malignancy 7.9%, and malignant 53.9%. The respective ROM for each category was 0% for category 1 (insufficient material), 4.5% for category 2 (benign), 50% for category 3 (atypical), 100% for category 4 (suspicious for malignancy), and 100% for category 5 (malignant). When calculating diagnostic accuracy and predictive values where only malignant cases were considered positive tests, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 94.40%, 100%, 100%, 91.66% and 96.55%, respectively. Conclusion: Categorization of the Breast FNAB cytology according to the newly proposed IAC Yokohama system of reporting helps pathologists in achieving diagnostic clarity and guides clinicians in appropriate patient management. IAC Yokohama system of reporting breast cytopathology can serve as a bridge between pathologists and clinicians in effective stratification of breast lesions.

Objective: We aimed to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and predictive values in prior breast cytology studies as a basis for the new International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytology, which classifies cytologic diagnoses into 5 categories: (1) insufficient material, (2) benign, (3) atypical, (4) suspicious of malignancy, and (5) malignant. Study Design: Publications between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2017, that studied the performance characteristics of FNAB from palpable and nonpalpable breast masses were identified through the PubMed database. Data for number of total cases and cases within each diagnostic category, if available, were collected. Performance characteristics, including absolute sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and ROM for each category were recorded or, when possible, calculated. Results: The literature review resulted in a case cohort of 33,341 breast FNABs, drawn from 27 studies. Pooling these cases together, the ROM for insufficient material, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant were 30.3, 4.7, 51.5, 85.4, and 98.7%, respectively. The complete sensitivity and specificity were 96.3 and 98.8%, correspondingly. The PPV and NPV were 98.7 and 95.3%, correspondingly. The false-negative and false-positive rates were 3.7 and 1.0%, respectively. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the diagnostic categories of the new IAC Yokohama System each carry an implied ROM, which increases from the benign to malignant categories. This study also shows the high sensitivity and specificity of FNAB for breast lesions.

Background: Benign and malignant lesions of breast are one of the most common causes of palpable masses seen in women. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the important modality of diagnosis of breast lumps. Previously, there were no uniform criteria for reporting breast FNAC. To overcome this problem, the newly designed system – International Academy of Cytology (IAC) – Yokohama system of reporting was implemented in 2016. The system offers a structured report to the patient. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to categorize breast FNAC according to the IAC – Yokohama system of reporting, to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of the test, and to analyze the cytomorphological spectrum of various breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 210 patients presenting with breast lump in cytology section were subjected to FNAC using a 22 gauge needle under all aseptic precautions. Detailed clinical history was taken. All cytology and histopathology examination slides (wherever available) were thoroughly studied. FNAC smears were reported using IAC – Yokohama system of reporting. Results: In our study, benign category (C2) was most commonly seen in 73.33% of cases, followed by 10.48% of cases of atypical probably benign (C3), 2.38% of cases were reported as suspicious (C4), and 11.43% of cases were reported as malignant (C5). Cytohistopathological concordance was seen in 38 cases (88.4%) whereas five cases were reported as discordant. Sensitivity and specificity of the test for the diagnosis of malignancy were 81% and 100%, respectively. PPV was 100%. NPV was 90.90%. Diagnostic accuracy of the test was 93.47%. Conclusion: The newer IAC – Yokohama system of reporting of breast FNAC is simple, has clear diagnostic criteria hence boost up the confidence as well has uniformity of reporting by cytopathologist, and increases the understanding and uniformity in assessment by the attending clinician which help in improving the communication between the pathologist and the treating clinician.

Background: Benign and malignant lesions of breast are one of the most common causes of palpable masses seen in women. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the important modality of diagnosis of breast lumps. Previously, there were no uniform criteria for reporting breast FNAC. To overcome this problem, the newly designed system – International Academy of Cytology (IAC) – Yokohama system of reporting was implemented in 2016. The system offers a structured report to the patient. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to categorize breast FNAC according to the IAC – Yokohama system of reporting, to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of the test, and to analyze the cytomorphological spectrum of various breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 210 patients presenting with breast lump in cytology section were subjected to FNAC using a 22 gauge needle under all aseptic precautions. Detailed clinical history was taken. All cytology and histopathology examination slides (wherever available) were thoroughly studied. FNAC smears were reported using IAC – Yokohama system of reporting. Results: In our study, benign category (C2) was most commonly seen in 73.33% of cases, followed by 10.48% of cases of atypical probably benign (C3), 2.38% of cases were reported as suspicious (C4), and 11.43% of cases were reported as malignant (C5). Cytohistopathological concordance was seen in 38 cases (88.4%) whereas five cases were reported as discordant. Sensitivity and specificity of the test for the diagnosis of malignancy were 81% and 100%, respectively. PPV was 100%. NPV was 90.90%. Diagnostic accuracy of the test was 93.47%. Conclusion: The newer IAC – Yokohama system of reporting of breast FNAC is simple, has clear diagnostic criteria hence boost up the confidence as well has uniformity of reporting by cytopathologist, and increases the understanding and uniformity in assessment by the attending clinician which help in improving the communication between the pathologist and the treating clinician.

Introduction: Breast cancer is rapidly emerging as the leading cause of cancer in Indian women. Cytopathology and histopathology services are required to tackle this growing burden. The use of International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama Reporting System of breast cytology by classifying them into five categories insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant. (IAC) Yokohama Reporting System offers structured protocols, are expected to improve breast cytopathology reporting. Objective : The main objectives of our study were to classify breast fine needle aspirates according to the IAC Yokohama system and assess the risk of malignancy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Methodology: All breast FNAs done in the above period were retrieved and classified into five categories according to the Yokohama system. Histopathological diagnosis was also retrieved wherever available. Results: The new “International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system” was used to categorize 205 patients into five categories based on the cytologic diagnosis. That C1: insucient material (7.8%), C2: benign (64.3%), C3: atypical (7.3%), C4: suspicious of malignancy (7.8%), and C5: malignant (12.6%). Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated which was 100% in Yokohama category I, IV and V. In category II ROM was 00% and in category III ROM was 55.5%. FNAC correlation with histopathology was significant (P Value=<0.01 & Chi square value 40.7). Conclusion: The IAC Yokohama system is an excellent system for accurately diagnosing breast fine needle aspirate. Keywords: Histopathology, International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System, Fine­ Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology

Background: The International Academy of Cytology (IAC). Yokohama System has created a standardized method of describing breast cytology by grouping them into five categories: inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant. To validate the likelihood of cancer in the various categories, several investigations have been undertaken at various institutions as a mandate. Aim: The main objective of the research is to identify the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for breast lumps by the Yokohama system for reporting and its correlation with histopathology. Methodology: The present study was a retrospective research performed over 8 months. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FANCs) for breast lumps are performed by the Yokohama system. Whenever accessible, histopathological diagnoses were also retrieved. Statistical Analysis Used: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were estimated using a histological diagnosis as the gold standard concerning each of the five categories. Results: Out of 200 cases, 106 had histopathological concordance. Five categories: insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant of the IAC Yokohama system were 1.00%, 62.50%, 4.50%, 1.50%, and 30.50%, Category 1 (1%), Category 2 (62.5%), Category 3 (4.5%), Category 4 (1.5%), and Category 5 (30.5%). When malignant, suspicious, and unusual cases were taken into account as positive test findings, the highest level of sensitivity (90.60%) was attained. The maximum specificity (100%) was seen when only malignant patients were taken into account as positive test findings, but the highest diagnostic accuracy (96.22%) was shown when the malignant and suspect categories were taken into account as positive test results. Conclusion: FNAC using the Yokohama system for reporting is an accurate diagnostic tool for breast lumps. The system provides a standardized framework for reporting FNAC findings, and studies have reported high sensitivity and specificity rates for diagnosing breast lumps using FNAC. Therefore, FNAC can be used in conjunction with histomorphology to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of breast lumps.

Objective: This study aims to determine the diagnostic utility of the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology in lesions of the male breast. Study Design: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) reports between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively recategorized according to the 5-tiered IAC Yokohama Reporting System. Our database yielded a total of 1,532 FNAB reports from breast lesions, obtained from 1,350 male patients. The risk of malignancy (ROM) and diagnostic performance of FNAB were determined using follow-up histopathological diagnosis and/or clinical follow-up, where available, for each category. Results: The category distribution were as follows: inadequate, 40%; benign, 57%; atypical, 0.6%; suspicious for malignancy, 0.7%; and malignant, 1.6%. The ROM in each category was nondiagnostic, 11%; benign, 3%; atypical, 28%; suspicious for malignancy, 56%; and malignant, 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were recorded as 63, 100, 100, and 84.6% respectively, when only malignant cases were considered as positive tests. Conclusion: This study validates the IAC Yokohama System for reporting male breast cytopathology. In accordance with the aim of the Yokohama System to establish best practice guidelines for reporting breast cytopathology, this comprehensive scheme facilitates comparisons between local and international institutions. The ROM acts as an internal audit for quality assurance within one’s own laboratory and provides guidance for clinical management. It highlights inefficiencies such as high inadequacy rates for category 1 and also features strengths with impressive specificity for categories 4 and 5.

Breast cytology is a significant component of the "Triple approach" for pre-operative diagnosis of breast lumps, the other two being clinical assessment and radiological imaging. The role of Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as a first line investigation in diagnosing breast lesions is well documented, however histopathology is the gold standard. Cyto-histopathological correlation is of great relevance and also increases precision.AIMS \& OBJECTIVES:The present study was conducted with the aim to categorize breast lesions according to the latest standardized reporting system proposed by International academy of cytologists (IAC) in 2016. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in diagnosing breast lesions and cyto-histopathological correlation was planned. All FNAs of breast lesions over a period of 2 years were included in the study. The cases were grouped into five standardized categories proposed by the International academy of cytology: Category I (Insufficient material), Category II (Benign), Category III (Atypical, probably benign), Category IV (Suspicious, probably in situ or invasive) & Category V (Malignant) respectively. Specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, negative and positive predictive value of FNAC were calculated and cyto-histopathological correlation assessed wherever possible. Out of 468 breast lesions reported on FNAC, the category wise distribution was - Category I, II, III, IV & V accounting for 23(4.9%), 342(73.07%), 7(1.5%), 11(2.35%) and 85(18.16%) respectively. Histopathology was performed in 331/468 cases with cyto histological concordance of 98.4% and a type agreement rate of 90.9%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy was 98.90%, 99.16%, 97.82%, 99.58% and 99.09% respectively. FNAC is a simple, reliable, cost effective, first line diagnostic procedure for all breast lumps. In collaboration with physical examination and imaging studies (triple approach), FNAC is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool. Adopting a universally acceptable standardized reporting system for breast cytology can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC.