Abstract
The current study examined the effect of simple complementary auditory feedback (CAF) on performance and performance strategies in a puzzle completion task. Fifty-three undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of two training groups: a CAF group, which received simple auditory feedback during the task; and a Control group, which did not receive the auditory feedback. The difference between the higher and lower achievers (in terms of time needed to complete the puzzle) was larger in the CAF group compared to the Control group. As for performance strategies, participants in the CAF group engaged less in strategies which involved pre-planning (for example, separating out edge pieces) and focused more on trying to maximize short-term achievements (for example, through trial and error). The findings suggest that CAF which entails low-level feedback is not recommended for weaker performers, for whom it promotes less-effective strategies focused on short-term goals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
