Abstract
<h2>ABSTRACT</h2> The present research is the second phase (2yr) of a multiyear cow-calf project examining the effect of stocking method, i.e., continuous and rotational, and fixed stocking rate on beef-cattle production. Two sets of 4 adjacent pastures, each containing a mixed warm-season, perennial grass sod [common bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum Poir.], were overseeded to ‘Marshall' annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in the autumn of 2 consecutive years. Within each set of 4 pastures, 1 of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: rotationally stocked (8 paddocks) at a low, medium, or high stocking rate (RL, RM, and RH) and continuously stocked at a moderate stocking rate (CM). Low, medium, and high stocking rates were 1.25, 2, and 2.75 cows/ha. Brangus cow-calf pairs were stocked on treatment pastures in March 2004. Mean cow BW was greater for RL compared with RM (P < 0.05; 569 vs. 527kg) but did not differ (P > 0.20) for the RM versus RH (522kg) and the RM versus CM (530kg) stocking-treatment comparisons. Calf-adjusted 205-d BW was similar for all treatment contrasts. Pasture weaning BW differed between the RL versus RM (P < 0.01; 238 vs. 394kg/ha) and the RM versus RH (P < 0.01; 394 vs. 583kg/ha) treatment contrasts but was similar for RM and CM (P = 0.23; 394 vs. 437kg/ha). Stocking rate influenced both cow and calf production, but stocking method had little or no effect in the current study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.