Abstract

Vultures provide an essential ecosystem service through removal of carrion, but globally, many populations are collapsing and several species are threatened with extinction. Widespread declines in vulture populations could increase the availability of carrion to other organisms, but the ways facultative scavengers might respond to this increase have not been thoroughly explored. We aimed to determine whether facultative scavengers increase carrion consumption in the absence of vulture competition and whether they are capable of functionally replacing vultures in the removal of carrion biomass from the landscape. We experimentally excluded 65 rabbit carcasses from vultures during daylight hours and placed an additional 65 carcasses that were accessible to vultures in forested habitat in South Carolina, USA during summer (June–August). We used motion‐activated cameras to compare carrion use by facultative scavenging species between the experimental and control carcasses. Scavenging by facultative scavengers did not increase in the absence of competition with vultures. We found no difference in scavenger presence between control carcasses and those from which vultures were excluded. Eighty percent of carcasses from which vultures were excluded were not scavenged by vertebrates, compared to 5% of carcasses that were accessible to vultures. At the end of the 7‐day trials, there was a 10.1‐fold increase in the number of experimental carcasses that were not fully scavenged compared to controls. Facultative scavengers did not functionally replace vultures during summer in our study. This finding may have been influenced by the time of the year in which the study took place, the duration of the trials, and the spacing of carcass sites. Our results suggest that under the warm and humid conditions of our study, facultative scavengers would not compensate for loss of vultures. Carcasses would persist longer in the environment and consumption of carrion would likely shift from vertebrates to decomposers. Such changes could have substantial implications for disease transmission, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functioning.

Highlights

  • The geographic distribution of vultures (Families Cathartidae and Accipitridae, Subfamilies Aegypiinae and Gypaetinae) spans five continents, and throughout their range vultures fulfill an important ecological role through consumption of carrion (DeVault et al, 2016; Ogada, Keesing, & Virani, 2012)

  • Black and turkey vultures are currently abundant in North America, it is possible that scavenging rates of mammals may increase should vulture populations decline and carrion availability subsequently increase, as has happened in India (Markandya et al, 2008)

  • We explored competition for carrion between vultures and mammals by experimentally excluding vultures from carcasses to test the hypothesis that vultures outcompete mammalian scavengers for carrion through exploitation competition

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The geographic distribution of vultures (Families Cathartidae and Accipitridae, Subfamilies Aegypiinae and Gypaetinae) spans five continents, and throughout their range vultures fulfill an important ecological role through consumption of carrion (DeVault et al, 2016; Ogada, Keesing, & Virani, 2012). The removal of obligate avian scavengers and human-­induced increases in carrion results in considerable carrion availability that could subsidize populations of facultative mammalian scavengers (Markandya et al, 2008). Determining how such an increase in abundance of mammals might occur requires an understanding of the mechanisms influencing competition between vultures and mammals for carrion. Black and turkey vultures are currently abundant in North America, it is possible that scavenging rates of mammals may increase should vulture populations decline and carrion availability subsequently increase, as has happened in India (Markandya et al, 2008). Following Ogada, Torchin et al (2012), we predicted that when vultures were excluded from carcasses, there would be (1) an increase in the presence of mammalian scavengers, (2) an increase in mammal species richness at carcasses, and (3) an increase in the persistence time of carcasses

| METHODS
| Study design
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.