Abstract

Driving safety depends on the drivers’ attentional focus on the driving task. Especially in complex situations, distraction due to secondary stimuli can impair driving performance. The inhibition of distractors or inadequate prepotent responses to irrelevant stimuli requires cognitive control, which is assumed to be reduced with increasing age. The present EEG study investigated the effects of secondary acoustic and visual stimuli on driving performance of younger and older car drivers in a driving simulator task. The participants had to respond to brake lights of a preceding car under different distraction conditions and with varying task difficulties. Overall, the anticipation of high demanding tasks affected braking response behavior in young and especially in older adults, who showed reduced cognitive control to task-relevant braking stimuli, as reflected by a smaller P3b. In a more easy (perception only) task, simultaneously presented acoustic stimuli accelerated braking response times (RTs) in young and older adults, which was associated with a pronounced P2. In contrast, secondary visual stimuli increased braking RTs in older adults, associated with a reduced P3b. In a more difficult (discrimination) task, braking response behavior was impaired by the presence of secondary acoustic and visual stimuli in young and older drivers. Braking RT increased (and the P3b decreased), especially when the responses to the secondary stimuli had to be suppressed. This negative effect was more pronounced with visual secondary stimuli, and especially so in the older group. In sum, the results suggest an impaired resistance to distractor interference and a reduced inhibition of prepotent responses in older drivers. This was most pronounced when the processing of task-relevant and irrelevant stimuli engage the same mental resources, for example, by sharing the same stimulus modality.

Highlights

  • Driver distraction is one of the most important causes of road traffic accidents in western countries (e.g., National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 2018)

  • The two age groups were comparable in several variables that might be associated with driving performance or distractibility

  • In a first step we tested the effect of task context on braking responses and P3b when no secondary stimulus was present. 2 × 2-ANOVAs with within-subject factor TASK and between-subject factor AGE were computed for single brake lights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Driver distraction is one of the most important causes of road traffic accidents in western countries (e.g., National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 2018). Typical examples for activities that divert attention from driving are conversations with other passengers (Dingus et al, 2016) and situations in which the driver looks away from the road, e.g., when using cell phones, reaching for objects, Aging, Distracted Driving and EEG operating air-conditioning or infotainment systems. It is unclear which types of distraction cause the greatest decline in driving performance. This concept of resource allocation could explain the extensive distraction effects of talking or calling, even though these tasks access quite different resources than the driving task

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call