Abstract
Background: Patient care needs and work hour restrictions have altered inpatient internal medicine educational experiences. Purpose: The goal is to compare different attending physician rotation lengths on medical students’ and attending physicians’ experiences. Methods: We studied clerkship students’ evaluations ( N= 86) and internal medicine attending surveys ( N= 21). We divided attending experiences into 2-week and 4-week rotations. We assessed exam scores and evaluations with 5-point Likert questions (5 = strongly agree). Means were compared with t tests, Wilcoxon Ranked Sums, and logistic regression. Results: More than 90% of students and attending physicians responded. Students and attending physicians generally evaluated their 2- and 4-week experiences similarly. Attending physicians favored 4 weeks for evaluating students’ performance (3.30 vs. 4.36, p< .01). Exam scores were similar in the 2- and 4-week student groups (M = 78.2, SD = 5.0 vs. 76.5, SD = 8.5, p= .43). Conclusions: Shorter rotations do not negatively impact students’ experiences. Obtaining quality evaluations may be difficult for shorter rotations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
