Abstract
We measured the effect of urea on M4-lactate dehydrogenase (M4-LDH) from elasmobranchs and Australian desert frogs (urea accumulators) and from two animals that do not accumulate urea, the axolotl and the rabbit. An analysis of the effect of urea on the Kd(NADH), V, V/Km(pyr) and V/Km(NADH) shows that in all cases the major effect of urea was on the binding of pyruvate, which fits with data in the literature that show that urea acts as a competitive inhibitor of LDH. The characteristics of the elasmobranch enzymes are consistent with a proposed adaptation model, but the situation for the enzymes from the aestivating frogs is equivocal. Urea (400 mM) had less effect on the Km(pyr) of M4-LDH from the urea accumulators than it did on the non-accumulators, suggesting a general adaptation and that the enzyme produced by the aestivating frogs (urea accumulators) is kinetically different from that of non-aestivating frogs (non-accumulators). A new approach is used to characterize the overall pattern of adaptation to urea. The pattern is similar in an enzyme from an elasmobranch and an aestivating frog despite the temporary presence of urea in the latter and the phylogenetic difference between these animals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
