Abstract
Recently, several invasive mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) have rapidly spread to Asia and have become a serious threat to the production of cotton including transgenic cotton. Thus far, studies have mainly focused on the effects of mealybugs on non-transgenic cotton, without fully considering their effects on transgenic cotton and trophic interactions. Therefore, investigating the potential effects of mealybugs on transgenic cotton and their key natural enemies is vitally important. A first study on the effects of transgenic cotton on a non-target mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) was performed by comparing its development, survival and body weight on transgenic cotton leaves expressing Cry1Ac (Bt toxin) + CpTI (Cowpea Trypsin Inhibitor) with those on its near-isogenic non-transgenic line. Furthermore, the development, survival, body weight, fecundity, adult longevity and feeding preference of the mealybug predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) was assessed when fed F. virgata maintained on transgenic cotton. In order to investigate potential transfer of Cry1Ac and CpTI proteins via the food chain, protein levels in cotton leaves, mealybugs and ladybirds were quantified. Experimental results showed that F. virgata could infest this bivalent transgenic cotton. No significant differences were observed in the physiological parameters of the predator C. montrouzieri offered F. virgata reared on transgenic cotton or its near-isogenic line. Cry1Ac and CpTI proteins were detected in transgenic cotton leaves, but no detectable levels of both proteins were present in the mealybug or its predator when reared on transgenic cotton leaves. Our bioassays indicated that transgenic cotton poses a negligible risk to the predatory coccinellid C. montrouzieri via its prey, the mealybug F. virgata.
Highlights
Modified (GM) crops hold great promise for pest control [1,2,3,4]
Our results demonstrate that F. virgata nymphs completed their development when reared on leaves of both non-transgenic and transgenic cotton
No significant differences were detected in the total survival, cumulative developmental duration and body weight of the immature stages of F. virgata reared on transgenic and nontransgenic cotton
Summary
Modified (GM) crops hold great promise for pest control [1,2,3,4]. Most popular GM crops express one or more toxin genes from bacteria such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), trypsin inhibitors such as cowpea trypsin inhibitor (CpTI), plant lectins, ribosome-inactivating proteins, secondary plant metabolites, vegetative insecticidal proteins and small RNA viruses [5,6,7]. To delay the development of pesticide resistance in the major cotton pests [7], the bivalent transgenic cotton cultivar (CCRI41) expressing Cry1Ac and CpTI, has been commercially available since 2002 in China [10]. The cotton cultivar CCRI41 is planted at a large scale in the Yellow river cotton area in China [11]. With the rapid expansion in the commercial use of GM plants, there is an increasing need to understand their possible impact on non-target organisms [12,13,14]. Non-target effects of several cultivars (Cry1Ac + CpTI cotton) on beneficial arthropods including pollinator insects have been recently studied [11,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
