Effects of training on sensitivities to spatial changes in auditory scenes

Abstract

Previous work has shown that change deafness can occur with changes in the spatial location of objects within auditory scenes. Whether performance can be improved with training has yet to be directly tested. In the present study, the impact of training was examined in a “flicker”-like paradigm, where an initial scene comprising environmental sounds presented on the horizontal plane alternated with the presentation of a comparison scene, which was either the same or contained a change in the location of one or more sounds. Trained participants were trained on a set of sounds on day 1, while control subjects completed an unrelated visual task. On day 2, participants were tested using the same paradigm, with trained subjects hearing either the sounds they were trained on or new sounds, and controls being exposed to the paradigm for the first time. Overall, trained participants performed better (93% accuracy) than untrained participants (79%). Both groups had lower reaction times on correct-response change trials than on correct-response no-change trials. Trained subjects performed no better on trained sounds than new sounds. These data indicate that training can improve task performance, but improvements may be not be limited to sounds experienced during training.Previous work has shown that change deafness can occur with changes in the spatial location of objects within auditory scenes. Whether performance can be improved with training has yet to be directly tested. In the present study, the impact of training was examined in a “flicker”-like paradigm, where an initial scene comprising environmental sounds presented on the horizontal plane alternated with the presentation of a comparison scene, which was either the same or contained a change in the location of one or more sounds. Trained participants were trained on a set of sounds on day 1, while control subjects completed an unrelated visual task. On day 2, participants were tested using the same paradigm, with trained subjects hearing either the sounds they were trained on or new sounds, and controls being exposed to the paradigm for the first time. Overall, trained participants performed better (93% accuracy) than untrained participants (79%). Both groups had lower reaction times on correct-response change tr...